this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
292 points (98.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43965 readers
907 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 46 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Conversely low res audio clearly sounds like trash.

[โ€“] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Up to a certain point, yes. >192k AAC / OGG / Opus sounds just as good as FLAC in a blind test, though. Even with good equipment.

[โ€“] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I'm thinking of circa 2000 MP3s. 128k was the good stuff and lower was still common.

[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Back when a 4 minute song was like 1.5MB so you could fit more music on your 256MB mp3 player because you could not afford an iPod.

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Oh yeah. 128k rips from back then were rough. MP3 has gotten somewhat better since then, to be fair. V0/V1 VBR is still perfectly fine to listen to; it's just not as efficient as the newer codecs.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

256/320 MP3s also do well. 128 MP3s not so much.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah they do, although CBR performs noticeably worse than VBR with Lame MP3. As I mentioned elsewhere, MP3 @ V0 or V1 VBR sounds just as good as the above. I just personally haven't used MP3 for years because the newer codecs are more efficient.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

VBR is always preferable over CBR, no matter video or audio encoding. I use OPUS a lot. Also YouTube providing OPUS 160 VBR as audio stream option for all of its content is very handy.