If Genocide wasn't on the ballot than how can you accuse anyone of supporting a genocide by the way they voted?
zbyte64
joined 7 months ago
Political parties don't learn, they respond to power.
They failed to predict voter sentiment so obviously they're right about the voters being at fault.
I don't think we were financing loans with GPUs as collateral back in 2012 or 2016: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2024/11/04/silicon-valley-and-wall-street-invent-collateralized-gpu-obligations-surely-this-will-work-out-fine/
Big difference between this and 2016 is JD Vance is the adult, not Mike Pence. His ties to Peter Thiel is scary. Also we just had a billionaire buy votes, no way that is going to stop now.
Markets are cyclic and we're overdue for the AI bubble to pop. But I don't think that automatically means the Democrats can win another presidential election or win the Senate.
That or the many other demoralizing speeches. We did not need to hear Clinton talk about human shields.
You might be on to something in the sense that coming back with a more inclusive response is a better approach. I don't think that makes them "right" though.
He will do half of what he said he would and say that is proof he was joking.
Missing context: the USA has the largest prison population.
Not if your single issue is preserving democracy ^___^
Jesus Christ people, you're talking about a genocide.