weirdwallace75

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Prove what? That you can't cite a law?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

You're saying absolute goddamned nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

If he's always on top of things, why is he doing this now and not sooner?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No, wrong. Or else teachers would be able to make copies of textbooks, and they're not.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah, this is definitely wrong. Giving away something you don't own is still illegal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hm. You have very little knowledge of American healthcare.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

That's beyond bad taste and into active stupidity.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This towel is warmer and bitier than usual.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There are whole-ass companies selling laptops with Linux preinstalled now. They work. Even with Bluetooth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You skipped glass as an option.

Glass is heavy and fragile, and dangerous when it breaks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The dollar is representative of the work you contributed to the economy

If that's true, nobody on Social Security Disability would be getting money.

28
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

A good post about the kinds of arguments people use online, including tactics which are about the argument itself or some of the people involved in the argument, as opposed to being about the argument's supposed topic.

You should know this to, one, avoid pointless "debates" where no actual issues get debated, two, to improve your own debate style to focus on the issues that need to be debated most, and, three, to see when others are merely acting like they're debating without actually debating the core issues the debate is supposed to be about.

view more: next ›