vacuumflower

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As others have said, lack of privacy is what makes BitTorrent not the best tool.

Other things may be inconvenient (like good old XDCC or using Google Disk for piracy), or "invisible Joe" (like ed2k, gnutella and Usenet, due to all of these just not being sufficiently monitored by law enforcement or neighbors interested in your porn taste) cases.

And Freenet, I2P (with iMule and what else there is, there was some sharing thing similar to ed2k in experience), RetroShare are not sufficiently popular.

In general good things are not popular.

My point is, let's wait for Locutus and whether it succeeds in transforming the Web.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's why they should make becoming an ISP something much more achievable legally, and not try to pay existing ISPs for something "universal". Then the problem is going to be solved really quick, almost as quick as laying cables.

Supply and demand are real, because they provide motivation for both sides, the consumer and the provider. Not the case with such bills.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I know this feels like mockery from a person with GPON to the door, but people like you still existing may be the reason the Web hasn't gone completely apeshit in bandwidth usage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And also separates your hand from the substance you are removing, not joins it. (Sorry, I just couldn't)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, well, that's what they are used to. All that obscurity in recommendations, weird way comment scores change over time (bots they don't fight or their own messing), weird way those affect karma, inconsistent application of rules, and so on.

Social media mods like obscurity which is alone a sufficient reason not to use that crap.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I came to Reddit in 2019, it felt nice then (avoided anything but tech discussions, though). Since 2020 it has been consistently getting worse, maybe before that too.

Anyway, centralization is bad. I'm not coming back.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Moscow, Russia. You can usually drink tap water in Moscow, but it's something unusually good for Russian bigger cities in general, and it's considered a good thing to boil it. Actually depends on local specifics and where the water comes from.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Well, analogy is not a sufficient method of argumentation by itself, but I suppose things I'll write would be even more visible in Chinese villages 100 years ago.

In Russia the peasant commune as an institution was created artificially (so all those Russian narodniks glorifying it as something perfect and wonderful untouched by bureaucratic machine coming from the depth of ages were just stupid ; it's one thing one can't argue with Lenin about - they didn't have a bloody idea of what that "people" they considered inherently virtuous was) somewhere around Peter the Great's time. So it's had enough time to mature.

That commune had enormous families living together, with the patriarch (the oldest man still able to work and do things) being basically a despot. It was literally not so rare for him to casually sleep with wives of his sons and nephews, for example (if not daughters and nieces). Nobody could refuse him.

Again, that whole family would live in one bloody place, together. No personal space or individuality at all.

In such an environment, first, you don't act differently (either you'll seem weak or you'll cause envy, both are worse than any gained efficiency justifies), second, your value is so low, that nobody cares if you make it, third, in a despotic system your own attempts at planning usually don't work, so you don't learn to do it, and planning is what's needed for more honest behavior to be advantageous.

So yes, you are right.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Just like in Russia nobles would hire French and German servants to look good. Like an expensive horse.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Well, many Chinese and Japanese plainly consider all non-Asians (and many Asians) savages. Racism is normalized there. Hierarchical centralized clan-based societies and thus certain lack of agility in social ties and traditions.

I mean, they are not much more racist that Middle-Eastern people. Just the Middle-East is (I know this may sound funny) socially more progressive in many places.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, the Finnish military should have inherited some things from the Russian imperial military, so this is to be expected. And it was a nationalist and traditionalist force which fought against Bolsheviks and won, getting itself a country (this kinda gets forgotten since the public image of Finland is very progressive and almost leftist now). And military is the most conservative institution in any country usually. Still weird.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I should spend more time in places I can meet British people then.

Where I live many people think that arguing with them means that I want to insult or dominate them.

view more: ‹ prev next ›