theilleist

You have the same beliefs as your great uncle. That's great. Does everyone have the same beliefs as their family members from 80 years ago?

Are you your ancestors? Am I mine?

Me: Just because MAGA's ancestors fought Nazi Germans doesn't mean MAGA aren't fascists.

You: By that logic you are a fascist.

OK buddy.

I use the construction "Chekhov's whatever" all the time to signify "something has been introduced so it will come up again later." It's a meme now. It has outgrown the gun.

Thou shalt not make a machine which becomes recursively worse at generating the likeness of a man.

OK, I'll fix it for you.

You walk into a restaurant. It's the only restaurant in town - indeed, your only available source of food at all. It has a menu of one dish only, changing every four years. It's been hot dogs for the past four years. Not your favorite, but tolerable.

A sign posted on the door says that the menu should be determined by the will of the customers, and broadly describes a process for them to express their preference. In practice, two factions of chefs have emerged. They each consult with their own set of customers about proposed menus, and narrow them down to two final options. For some reason, Team Hamburger wants to put poison in the hamburgers, and their customers agree.

You sit down for a nice hot dog and say to your friend, "Not only do I think pizza tastes better, I think it would stand a better chance of averting a mass hamburger poisoning. We could change our minds about trying for hot dogs again." Your friend retorts, "We are already committed to hot dogs. Stop talking about pizza. Pizza is impossible. It's not going to happen. And frankly, that kind of talk makes you sound like you want poisoned hamburgers. You don't want poisoned hamburgers, do you?"

A week later, pizza happens. Does your friend owe you an apology?

Then you're right. It wasn't disingenuous. Merely stupid.

"disingenuous

adjective

not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does"

Was this analogy sincere? Did you know it was flawed when you said it?

Did you mean the 25th amendment? Article 12 just describes the process for electing the president and VP.

I've heard (debated) etymology that "man" is gender neutral because in older English, "male" would have been "wereman" and "female" would have been "wifman," so the "man" morpheme just designated "human" and the prefix designated the gender.

Which does imply that "were"wolves are exclusively male, and a female wolf person really should be called a wifwolf.

"Gee I'm so grateful for all this trauma."

For me it was the natural conclusion from coming to accept a no-collapse interpretation of quantum mechanics. Before that, the ghost in the machine seemed to me like maybe it could be hiding somewhere in the spooky apparent randomness of wavefunction collapse, but if the universal wavefunction fully and deterministically describes the evolution in time of all particles everywhere, and there are no terms for "thoughts and feelings and free will" in that equation, then they are epiphenomena.