Hi,
I have a Pi-Hole set up on my home network, which I access from anywhere through a SWAG reverse proxy at https://pihole.mydomain.org
. I have set up a local DNS record in Pi-Hole to point mydomain.org
to the local IP of the SWAG server.
Access from anywhere (local or not) works well. It's just that when I am accessing some services (including the Pi-Hole) from my desktop through the reverse proxy via the DNS record (i.e. on the LAN), the Pi-Hole log gets completely spammed with requests like in the attached image. To be clear, I cropped the image, but it is pages and pages of the same. This is also the case for e.g. the qBittorrent Docker container I have set-up. So I guess it's for 'live' pages which update their stats continuously, which makes sense. But the Pi-Hole log is unusable in this state. This does not occur when I am accessing the services externally, through the same reverse proxy, or when I access them locally with their local IP.
The thing is, I have already selected Never forward non-FQDN A and AAAA queries
in the Pi-Hole settings. I also have Never forward reverse lookups for private IP ranges
, Use DNSSEC
, and Allow only local requests
, but they seem less relevant.
The Pi-Hole, SWAG server, and PC I am accessing them from are three different machines on my LAN.
Any way to filter out just those queries? I obviously want to preserve all the other legitimate queries coming from my desktop.
EDIT: Thanks for the responses. Unfortunately the problem persists, but I discovered something new. This only happens when accessing the page from Firefox desktop; not another desktop browser, and not Firefox Android. So actually it seems to be a Firefox problem, not a Pi-Hole one. I thought this might have something to do with Firefox's DNS-over-HTTPS, so I tried both adding an exception for my domain name, and disabling it altogether, but that didn't solve it..
The Hubble Tension is certainly real. The Hubble Constant can be estimated from a number of completely independent astrophysical phenomena. There is a significant difference in the value computed from 'local' phenomena, and distant phenomena. It is often referred to as the "5 sigma" tension, because that is the statistical significance of the disagreement. This has been know long before James Webb, but as the article says, these observations just lowered the uncertainty on one of the probes. But we were fairly certain already that this tension is real.
Whether it's a crisis or not is up to the individual. Things not agreeing in science
especially astrophysics/cosmology
is just part of the process. I don't know anyone that is 'worried', so much as looking for ways to solve the problem.