When you meet a bear in the woods, there is a 0% chance they will notice how the situation bears a resemblance to the popular meme and proceed to mansplain about how bears are more dangerous.
This is and has always been the one and only reason women choose the bear. But one question yet eludes us: how did the cycle start?
or that I don't want to (google what it is and then) press some weird keybind and spend minutes scrolling through the list of emojis when good ol' emoticons do the trick
floats
cosmologists: sin(x) ~= 10
aliens decide to shoot a literal star at earth
not that weird, every low effort meme uses the default settings of the most popular free image generator
what's wrong with them? are you sure it's just not set to use 100% of all cores, and then the OS does some shuffling?
the "will linearly speedup anything [to the amount of parallel computation available]" claim is so stupid that I think it's more likely they meant "only has a linear slowdown compared to a basic manual parallel implementation of the same algorithm"
Why would anyone let you stockpile resources they create?
the same reason people let it happen now: people aren't actually a hivemind where every individual steadfastly holds to your chosen ideology and ceaselessly watches each other and keeps precise track of what everyone is doing. Surveillance states can't root out crime and black markets, so I very much doubt a loose association of stateless communes can do it either.
That group won't exist in a vacuum. It needs to be resilient to outside interference. Even inside that group there are going to be people that only identify with it out of convenience rather than true belief. It is still possible for individuals to accrue social capital, form "inner circles" and individually stockpile resources - and stopping them would logically infringe on their freedoms to associate, freedom to dig holes, etc.
nah, but in hindsight it may be a bit too subtle
are you a goldfish.