sudo

What point of mine are you trying to refute here? Sacramento and Albany were never the population centers of their states as your theory suggests. They were selected because of their central geographic location as with the vast majority of US state capitals.

Its like your hung up on me saying "population drifts towards the capital" because it generally does but rarely overcomes any major metropol on the coast.

No its just completely wrong theory. Population centers are usually on the edge of the state and capitals are deliberately kept in the geographic center of the state. If the population center isn't on the edge then its in the capitol.

That's completely wrong. Many states moved their capital away from population centers on the coast into more geographically central locations inland. Other states deliberately planned their capitals to be in central locations when it was already clear where the population centers were going to be.

If anything the capital city only grows and becomes the population center. Population never drifts away from the capital.

We got a solution for climate change.

WTF are you smoking? Most Latin american elections are more politically comparable to the US than Germany and Romania.

I run commands as the root user so I use the root users configs. Usually that's in /root/.config/ but it might be different in NixOS.

You'll have to either copy your configs over to the root users config dirs. I highly recommend auditing what you copy though for security.

The government funding is really key here. We would be seeing communists constantly starting co-ops if seed money wasn't a barrier. That's not to say co-ops would be successful.

One could argue that profit is waste.

Its not, its profit. Dividends to share holders are interest payments on vital loans which co-ops don't have access too. Those early investments provide more of an edge than not having to pay them. Otherwise firms wouldn't bother with investors at all.

You could say excessive c-suite salaries are a waste. But those high salaries gets you the absolute psychos who will squeeze more excess value from the workers than any co-op could. Co-op workers wont be as greedy with wages or benefits, but they will absolutely look to cut their workload and get more free time (actual freedom).

Part of being a Marxist is accepting that the capitalist theory of profit motive applying to everyone is true. Its not universally true to everyone in every instance. And its certainly not a moral imperative like capitalist ghouls believe. But when we're talking about statistics and large populations it absolutely does hold.

Making more co-ops doesn't make them any more competitive against companies that exploit their workers for extra profit.

If you can make a successful co-op then go for it. But they absolutely aren't a path to any sort of revolution, which communists are all about. Forming a labor union in a critical industry is a much higher priority for communists than starting another co-op.

Good instincts and all but he always been a hard core salafist. Leftists were calling him that all last year. Its just now that Trump's in power liberals can pretend that they were always against him.

Its the same neocons who wanted Biden to stay in Afghanistan. Anyone who thinks neocons have a popular base is a gigantic moron. The amount of neocon voters is roughly equivalent to Americans with a transatlantic accent.

The republicans realized it yesterday when he took the plane. That was the nail in the coffin of their party.

Keep dreaming.