realcaseyrollins

Hey! Don't kink shame.

Honestly, for the next college football season, this and ESPN Flagship will probably be all I will need more or less. If I ever want Fox News (which I like less and less over time but might still be useful for presidential debates and such), this means I'll be able to essentially get it a-la-carte. Very nice.

I appreciate that everyone is doing a-la-carte in the year I'm moving out of my parents' place lol

I don't think that's what the article is talking about but okay

I disagree here somewhat. Now, maybe you know more about the background of ICE and how it's been utilized in the past, admittedly I am not. But from the outside looking in, I can't imagine a reason why ICE would have gone into reservations looking for Native Americans. If ICE usually isn't sicced on Native Americans, it would make sense that they don't have a process for validating the citizenhood of these Americans (although that certainly is quite an oversight).

As far as what documentation ICE looks for, isn't that the stuff on this list:

https://www.uscis.gov/save/current-user-agencies/commonly-used-immigration-documents

As the article you shared states:

Despite possessing Certificates of Indian Blood (CIBs) and state-issued IDs, several individuals have been detained or questioned by ICE agents who do not recognize these documents as valid proof of citizenship.

I am inclined to agree with the post and what the Navajo Nation Council is asking for:

Navajo Nation Council Speaker Crystalyne Curley emphasized the immediate need for the Executive Branch to issue protocols for tribal members living off-reservation.

What an excellent question. I think most of them view it as a distinction without a difference, they don't care at all if an migrant is legal or illegal. I think they also are subscribing to the slippery slope fallacy, assuming that those who want to deport illegals also want to have citizens deported from the country.

Yeah. It took me a loooooooong time for me to come up with that phrasing. The rule allows for someone to say something like:

"He should get the death penalty"

"If Ireland is attacked militarily, they should retaliate"

But not things like:

"They should go out and hang him"

"Punch those people when you see them"

The only way she gets relevance now is if she's talking about other people

How much federal funding do they get?

MTG doesn't actually want anything she's just an empty vessel through which Trump moves in every way except the one way she wants him too (maybe that's over the line but it's just the impression I get)

The hearings never mean anything anyways