Donald Trump trails with an estimated zero votes...
Yes, the system works!
Jimmy Carter has to hang on for 14 more years.
Does anyone know if "already voted" people are included in prospective voter polls? If they are excluded, we might be seeing a shift in polling towards Trump because his supporters vote day-of more than Harris voters.
But isn't Gannett a conservative company? Is this good news, like if Fox News or OANN says they won't endorse a candidate?
What, pray tell, do you think the Russian P-tape is? It has nothing to do with urine. The letters that follow the P are E D and O.
I was just explaining this concept to someone about the 2016 polls: all the posters thought of PA,MI, and WI as independent. Each had a 50% chance of going to Trump and he needed all three to win. So they projected him winning at (1/2)^3=1 in 8 chance of winning. Then they found out that those three were correlated.
I would say if Trump wins WI he wins PA and MI; and if Harris wins PA she wins WI and MI; BUT, if Trump wins PA he is not guaranteed a win in WI nor Harris winning WI guarantees a PA win.
What happens if there is a projected tie, but then we have a faithless elector?
Imagine the shit show if Trump secured enough republicans to vote for him in a tie breaking scenario, and then they open the ballots and see one Trump vote go for Romney or something.
Don't engineers have a portable AH?
This is why I don't like mail in voting: People other than the voter can tell the person how to vote. It is just blatantly obvious in this case.
Pokemon Go to the polls!
Merrick Garland: "Wait, they can do that?"