qfjp

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Only because he'll get a ticket if he's caught not wearing his seatbelt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

How is ESO outsourced? It's made by a studio within Zenimax that was basically created just for that game.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

*it is I, THE IGNORANT ONE!

Heard it the same exact way when I was reading it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, it's like you ignored everything I just said

Yup, seek help.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You should have deleted your comment.

It literally said "ignore this."

Seek help.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Dude, i wasn't even trying to talk to you. I thought I was talking to the other guy, which is why I left that there. Calm down.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I just realized you're not the same person, but your response is still weird given the context of the conversation.

Original below, but ignore it I guess.


Because at some point people have to figure out their own shit for themselves.

Uh...The question was "why is the US so involved with Israel," and you replied it's because the US is against genocide. So then, 'shouldn't Israel be figuring its shit out' without us?

We usually get involved when things get extreme, or when someone's trying to keep us from the oil (just keeping it real).

Agreed, but I'm not the one picking favorites here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

There were/are many genocides over the past 70 years for which the US had/has the chance to intervene. If this was really our goal, why haven't/don't we step in for them?

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But have you given your friends any pop quizzes though?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, that makes sense. I still miss the text reflow that browser had, but I've long given up on finding a replacement for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Do you mean you're given a choice in Firefox or in other apps? I meant being presented with a private/regular mode choice when opening from other apps, like sharing a link or using "open in browser".

Oh I see, I'm talking about where everything is in firefox, though if you mean just on the regular context menu of any link I don't see that for chrome either. In fact it looks like the only way to do it in either browser is what you said: choose in the settings to either have plain tabs or private by default. Now I'm curious how you managed to do it in other browsers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Different commenter, but I'm on android 13 and private browsing works just fine for me. Private links are kept in a separate 'group' from normal tabs, and you're given the option to choose if you long press on a link.

view more: ‹ prev next ›