papertowels

joined 1 year ago
[–] papertowels 62 points 1 year ago

Padme_meme.jpg

[–] papertowels 2 points 1 year ago

What executive level policies would you like to see enacted?

[–] papertowels 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, gotcha, sorry I thought you were talking about your works software development priorities

[–] papertowels 2 points 1 year ago
[–] papertowels 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't count on the average American voter to understand nuance

[–] papertowels 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Care to share what industry you're in?

[–] papertowels 1 points 1 year ago

Can you cite your sources? This excerpt from the published article suggests you're wrong:

The FDA recommended maximum DIV for aspartame for humans is 50 mg/kg (33). Based on allometric conversion utilizing pharmacokinetic and body surface area parameters (43), the mouse equivalent of the human DIV is 615 mg/kg/d. Therefore, the male mice received a daily aspartame dose equivalent to 14.0%, 7.0%, and 3.5% of the FDA recommended human DIV, and the females received a dose equivalent to 15.5%, 7.7%, and 3.9% of the human DIV.

[–] papertowels 3 points 1 year ago

Here's the relevant sentence in the study:

The FDA recommended maximum DIV for aspartame for humans is 50 mg/kg (33). Based on allometric conversion utilizing pharmacokinetic and body surface area parameters (43), the mouse equivalent of the human DIV is 615 mg/kg/d. Therefore, the male mice received a daily aspartame dose equivalent to 14.0%, 7.0%, and 3.5% of the FDA recommended human DIV, and the females received a dose equivalent to 15.5%, 7.7%, and 3.9% of the human DIV.

It's a lot to unpack, but my interpretation is that it's been adjusted for a rat

view more: ‹ prev next ›