moujikman

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting linguistic history: the strategy was to label everything that was bad as Jewish. It wasn't the other way around where everything a Jewish person does is wrong/bad. If chickens didn't lay enough eggs then it was considered Jewish (or Non-aryan). So any piece of literature is immediate nonsense because the words just don't have the same meaning. It was an attempt at two-value orientation, so it would just evoke a good/bad or right/wrong response without any further thought. You still see this today with stuff like how American politicians talk about China, same sex marriage, immigration from mexico, etc.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Hibiscus is awesome. It's zero calories, tastes like juice, and cheap. You can add it to your own homemade low calorie kombucha and you're in flavor town.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Lame reply, do better next time. I worked hard on that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Rejected because of a technicality. Even heaven is Kafkaesque.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Of course they still don't see a difference between scientific sensors and spying equipment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

China is doing predatory pricing on one of the most expensive purchases that people will do in their lifetime? Neat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Whether intentional or unintentional, assigning a specific definition to a term that lacks a commonly accepted meaning is a conversational obstructionist strategy, a tactic broadly known as 'framing'. It is used extensively by politicians to control the narrative around socialism (think red scare, palmer raids, etc). While "social democracy" is a positive framing, it still obstruct the original statement. In this case ending up in a semantics debate or attempting to assign a different emotional message. I'm not ragging on you specifically, I just want to point out that this is a thing people do.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, a business that exists to take losses. Sure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you have one hard drive out of raid, and 4 hard drives in raid, and the out of raid drive failed. Is it software raid or hardware raid? If it's software raid then you need to know the original configuration. If it hardware raid then you should be good to go.

view more: ‹ prev next ›