No, it's not a universal requirement nor is it particularly determined by the quality of your beans/grinder. Some very expensive grinders have anti-static mechanisms and better grinders typically have less static cling and retention. It's also not so much about handling the grounds as it is about preventing small amounts of grounds from clinging to the inside of the grinder or your dosing cup.
kogasa
joined 2 years ago
Yeah, one of the key insights is that the extraction plateaus after a relatively short time and you won't ever "over-steep" it, which is counterintuitive at least to me
Some grinders are particularly prone to static cling, my Fellow Ode v1 is terrible about it even in Florida
Measure the beans, spritz them, maybe shake them around a little to distribute the water, put in grinder. No need to wait. It should be a miniscule amount of water, you don't want your grinder gears to rust.
The interesting part is the detection of AI crawlers and selectively feeding them markov chain nonsense
The amount of VRAM isn't really the issue, even an extremely good GPU like the 7900XTX (with 24GB VRAM) struggles with some ray tracing workloads because it requires specially designed hardware to run efficiently
So yeah that mission was so cookie cutter and done a thousand times before you confused it for a cowboy movie.
I didn't confuse it for anything. That's what happens in the mission. The shootout is what makes you move camp.
You mean the part where you go up on a mountain to ambush a pair of shepherds with your newly-purchased scoped rifle, intimidating them into abandoning their flock by sending bullets whizzing past their ear, herding the flock into town to collect payment only to be pegged as rustlers and forced to haggle to buy the auctioneers' discretion? The mission that leads you directly to Leviticus Cornwall, one of the game's main antagonists, and a major holdup/shootout? Yeah that IS a pretty good mission.
RDR2 is a fucking incredible game with easily 50-100+ hours of enjoyable content if you only play it once. Crazy take
Choking hazard for small children probably.
No, the EO as written presumes that there is such a thing as a binary sex which is determined at conception such that those who belong to one sex go on to develop sperm and so on. How those sexes are defined and how to determine whether one belongs to one or the other is left unspecified. It's not a technical document, it's just supposed to harm a specific group of people rather than offer a coherent perspective.
It means they admit they were wrong and you were correct. As in, "I have been corrected."