jhymesba

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Fair point. I did misread 'one on one' to mean Democrat vs Republican with 'stepping back' to mean viewing Third Parties.

I totally agree with your reasoning, as it was my reasoning. The guy is old, not a debate. He's a gaffe machine, too. Some people pushed the meme he was losing a step, but while I saw him as old, I didn't see him as washed up or senile. The guy just doesn't know how to NOT put his foot in his mouth (I share a lot in common with him on that regard!!!), and there were an awful lot of bad-faith actors saying that he wasn't just old, but senile as well. They're still around, saying he's too old and senile to run the show now, and he should resign.

I think how Harris is being treated by various people on and offline should be a key indicator that Biden's resignation wasn't the end of the bullshit factories. They each have their own desires for their choice of President, and they can't even agree with each other who that choice is. Some will scream for Sanders. Others will scream for Stein. Some particularly pigeon-holed ones will argue for Fruit, despite her being mathematically eliminated from 270 before the first vote is cast. And lets get real. There are all to many of them who will tell you "IMMA FOR JILL" or some other tiny Third Party candidate while actually wanting Trump. Some think that a Trump presidency will lead them to the Progressive Promised Land. Others...are here to ensure we're so busy infighting that we can't put a unified resistance up, so they can get the Handmaiden's Tale they desparately want.

If Biden gave up because America is dumb, I don't blame him. In 2016, I tried hard to get out and get to Canada or New Zealand. But now Canada and New Zealand are overrun or about to be overrun by dumb people too. :|

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

This poster thinks I didn't know. But how can it know that. I just pointed out that there were literally hundreds of articles, then correctly cited the date. It's not making the point it thinks it's making. The media covered both idiots that took the pot shots at the Trumpster Fire. To the tune of hundreds of articles.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Folks, win or lose, the aftermath of election day will be a shitshow. I've written up a guide for how to survive Election Day 2024. The TL;DR: form is prepare for a hurricane or blizzard, with a nod to crazy people by preparing for self-defence, then be ready to hunker down. Election 2024 promises to be crazy, given how 2020 went down. Please look after yourselves!

 

So we don't feed Monk, here's a clean article with some commentary from me and a few quotes:

Some Democrats worry, for instance, that the party still isn’t doing enough to engage low-propensity Black and Latino voters, particularly young men.

I think Obama is keying on that. It's brutal out there for young people. They feel abandoned by American politics in general, and may not remember the shitshow that was Trump, mainly because...

Democrats also wonder if they failed to define Trump early in the cycle, letting him slowly rehabilitate his favorability numbers. Still others fear they didn’t remind voters early on of the horrors of Trump’s first term, leaving them with rosy memories of his presidency—including blue-collar voters’ fond impressions of the Trump economy. Those latter two problems may not be repairable in time.

Ain't that the truth. Americans are DUMB and have the collective memory of a goldfish. Assuming they'll remember last week is a bad assumption. Why aren't I seeing more ads online and on TV reminding us of kids in cages, firing key workers before a pandemic, sharpies and hurricanes, and all the other bullshit this bullshit artist has done. Start it now.

There is still time to fix this problem, many of these Democrats say, and the PAC’s resource sharing has improved in recent days. But time is running out.

Would like to see more details of how it's improving...

The PAC, they say, favors ads on broadcast television aimed at broad audiences—when reaching young and nonwhite voters requires a more targeted digital approach because their media sources have grown so fractured.

Why not both? This might be why Walz is on a World of Warcraft stream and Harris went on 'Call her Daddy', though. We'll have to reach out to the youth where the youth is.

A Democrat familiar with the Super PAC’s thinking pointed out that it is currently running a heavily backed ad featuring a Black, blue-collar narrator talking about Trump’s tax cuts for the rich.

That's a good idea. Are they pairing it with Trump's ties to Project 2025 and his abhorent treatment of kids at the border? Remind voters that right before the pandemic that upended the world, Trump fired the entire pandemic team? And then called it a Dem Hoax when it happened?

Meanwhile, some Democrats say that the PAC didn’t put enough resources into early ads defining Trump

Yep. I am one, if you can't tell. ;)

It’s a basic truism of politics that winning campaigns were run by geniuses and losing ones were run by numbskulls. So if Harris wins, Future Forward will appear to have gotten all this right, perhaps brilliantly so. But if she loses, the recriminations—not just directed at Future Forward, but all throughout the party—will be severe.

Alas, this is true. Hindsight is 20-20. We'll see on the morning of the sixth...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm misgendering this poster because it insists that I am just like Republicans. Which is a fucking lie. And another violation of Rule 3. Is the poster can't take it, don't dish it. And maybe stop using its transgenderness as a cover for its incivility!

I'll let it have the last word now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

You think you have a big gotcha here, but it was covered extensively when it happened. The google (or Bing in this case)(you don't want us to do returns over 10 pages of results, including articles from:

  • NBC News (top result)
  • US News
  • AP News
  • Wikipedia
  • CNN
  • NY Times
  • LA Times (literally, coast to coast here)
  • NPR
  • Reuters
  • Fox News (of course...)
  • Politico

Some of these sources wrote more than one article, with at least three by CNN and two by NPR.

You might think none of us know that Trump came close to assassination on 2024-09-15, but did you know that Trump didn't tell his secret service detail he was going to the golf course, so they didn't do a perimeter sweep before he got out there? They only found the shooter because Trump was finishing up one hole and they rushed to the next and spotted the would-be assassin.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Well, Trump has already killed millions of people with his stupidity. What's a few more?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

This poster doubles down. It doesn't care to show me civility or respect, and instead makes thinly veiled insults at me and my father, which of course it knows nothing about. And then it expects me to do it the kindness of taking it at face value.

Like I told the last poster that tried this tact with me, we're on the internet, where the men are men, the women are men, the children are FBI agents, of course this poster is a transgender Russian expat, and nobody, and I mean nobody knows I'm a cat. If it's going to call me a xenophobe and a conservative, then it'll have to deal with being treated as something it's not too. It can either stop being a jerk to me, or it can block me. But it won't be calling me a xenophobic conservative without SOME response, as hampered as that response may be by the rules of this community.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Got proof of this? I mean, only once in my lifetime has a third party cracked 10% of the vote share. Easily 90% of the votes given have gone to a guy or gal with an -R or -D after their name for President.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

casual xeophobia --> You lot being sore loser hard-leftists, Greenies pissed that they don’t have more of a say in government, paid actors and disinformation peddlers hired by Republicans and Russians to fragment the Left coalition like has happened time and time again (stupid ‘fall in love’ party), and of course those same Russians and Republicans who directly inject BS into our political discussion.

Dear reader, just to be clear what this poster is trying to hide in its quote. It doesn't try to refute a single word of this. No. It goes off on a tangent about how mean liberals are calling out the Russian involvement in propping up the Fascist Dictator Wannabe while tearing down Team Blue for the lulz. Despite the fact that I called out everyone in this faction trying to tear down the Left and prop up the Right, including the hard-core "Dems aren't left enough" leftists, the Greenies that only seem to pop out during the Presidential Elections to tear down the Left and give the Right a chance to steel it, useful idiots who don't realise they are being played, and the bad actors who really DO want a Single-Party Republican Dictatorship with elements taken from Handmaiden's Tale, 1984, and Hunger Games for good measure. Rather than engage or refute any of these truths, it gets all butthurt about how we distrust Russians when really, all we distrust are the Russian government, who has repeatedly put their thumb on the scale for the Authoritarian Conservatives of our country.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I just want to point out that you didn't need to tone police yourself for my satisfaction. You needed to tone police yourself to the mods satisfaction. And you failed. I have no power here. My constant bitching about how the mods show you lot too much difference should make that abundantly clear. I called you out to the mods. They found you lacking. Maybe leave off accusations about shitting peoples pants in the future and you won't get modded? That said, I'm done with you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Right. I like meat. Not going to lie – I can be convinced to eat more plants and less meat, but I’ll fight you if you try to take my meat away.

My father and I can’t be further apart on politics. He’s a Goldwater Republican, old-school hard-core conservative that doesn’t like Trump the man, but loves Trump the politician. He runs his big truck on >>Earth Day just to spite the Environmentalists.

Sounds like you guys have a lot in common behaviorally despite your professed political differences.

And you wonder why you get so many downvotes and pushback. You stand in judgement over what somebody else wants to eat. It's not enough for you to meet half way. If they don't capitulate 100% to you and subjugate themselves at your feet, you spit bile at them. You automatically assume the worst about other people, hurl invectives at them, and wonder why it is your candidate of choice doesn't win. Thanks for illustrating that 'my way or the highway' isn't just Republican territory.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (9 children)

Because your phrasing is disingenuous. You imply nefariousness where none exists. He ran thinking he was the best choice, until he flubbed the debate, and ... get this...he got the majority of delegates. 14 million people voted for him. And he won the Primary. Are you saying you and your ilk are more important than the 14.5 million people who cast their ballots for him (you couldn't manage 2 million votes between your three alternatives to Biden...), and the 3.9k delegates he won? That their expressions of preference should be thrown out so you can have a bruising 4 week primary in August while Trump just uses your various attacks against each of the candidates and racks up hundreds of millions of campaign contributions that he doesn't have to spend until September? And at best, we just use up Biden's campaign warchest trying to fend your candidates off, and at worst, we have to start over with some relative unknown with a depleted warchest, and no access to the Biden/Harris warchest? And go through the whole rigamarole of qualifying for state ballots so close to election day? Not to mention the extra costs of running a second set of primaries because you couldn't accept the fact that you lost?

We had a primary. Biden won that primary. There's no nefarious plan to install Harris. And the only reason that Harris has to run at all is because you lot showed up here and shat all over Biden over and over and over and over and *four hours later * over again. You lot being sore loser hard-leftists, Greenies pissed that they don't have more of a say in government, paid actors and disinformation peddlers hired by Republicans and Russians to fragment the Left coalition like has happened time and time again (stupid 'fall in love' party), and of course those same Russians and Republicans who directly inject BS into our political discussion. And just to be clear, I'm not speculating on which you are, just pointing out that's what your coalition is, and that's why we're here where we are right now.

view more: next ›