this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
5 points (85.7% liked)

politics

19087 readers
5799 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (16 children)

Can you help me find kamala on my primary ballot from this year? ( I voted no preference)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Kamala Harris is Joe Biden's running mate.

Were Biden to have been incapacitated, Kamala Harris would step in for him. We made this choice back in November 2020, and it'll hold true until January 2025.

Do you expect the Dems to have a contested Primary with less than one month to go until the General? How nice. Everyone will be tearing themselves apart in order to appeal to the various different factions that make up the Democratic Party, weakening each other until the final canidate emerges with a depleted warchest and a whole bunch of bitter people whose favoured candidate DIDN'T win? And assuming Harris, the VP and assumed successor for Biden, doesn't win this contested primary, has to return the warchest Biden built up?

And Trump will be waiting in the wings, with a building warchest and backers setting up GOTV. Again. Does the far-left WANT Trump to win, because man, that's what it looks like to me!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Kamala Harris is Joe Biden’s running mate.

Yes I know.

Hand picked successor. Why is everyone so mad that I'm calling it what it is?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Because your phrasing is disingenuous. You imply nefariousness where none exists. He ran thinking he was the best choice, until he flubbed the debate, and ... get this...he got the majority of delegates. 14 million people voted for him. And he won the Primary. Are you saying you and your ilk are more important than the 14.5 million people who cast their ballots for him (you couldn't manage 2 million votes between your three alternatives to Biden...), and the 3.9k delegates he won? That their expressions of preference should be thrown out so you can have a bruising 4 week primary in August while Trump just uses your various attacks against each of the candidates and racks up hundreds of millions of campaign contributions that he doesn't have to spend until September? And at best, we just use up Biden's campaign warchest trying to fend your candidates off, and at worst, we have to start over with some relative unknown with a depleted warchest, and no access to the Biden/Harris warchest? And go through the whole rigamarole of qualifying for state ballots so close to election day? Not to mention the extra costs of running a second set of primaries because you couldn't accept the fact that you lost?

We had a primary. Biden won that primary. There's no nefarious plan to install Harris. And the only reason that Harris has to run at all is because you lot showed up here and shat all over Biden over and over and over and over and *four hours later * over again. You lot being sore loser hard-leftists, Greenies pissed that they don't have more of a say in government, paid actors and disinformation peddlers hired by Republicans and Russians to fragment the Left coalition like has happened time and time again (stupid 'fall in love' party), and of course those same Russians and Republicans who directly inject BS into our political discussion. And just to be clear, I'm not speculating on which you are, just pointing out that's what your coalition is, and that's why we're here where we are right now.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Biden quit the race because he had no path to victory. He was 100% going to lose. The betting odds have shifted against Harris and now Trump has a 55% chance of winning. Why? Because she comes across as a cop. Because she supports a genocide. Because she cant give a beleiveable speech that makes her seem relatable. Because she stupidly brags about owning a gun. Because she has drifted right and probably will continue to, looking to get votes that dont exist while she loses the left. This is another case of the dem establishment shitting the bed, same as they always do, and losing to a clear nutcase. Why is the Democratic party engaged in supporting a far right wing war? Its for some $$$, right? So hows that truning out? Not good? THEN WHY DID SHE TAKE THE MONEY? Why is our party so stupid.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You imply nefariousness where none exists.

I'm just using the language our press uses for enemy nations, like calling it the Biden regime, because it's what I do when warmongers are president, it's what I did for Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump and here we are now.

casual xenophobia

I’m not speculating on which you are, just pointing out that’s what your coalition is, and that’s why we’re here where we are right now

Like I'll cop to being Russian but you need to understand it's getting really insulting how often liberals go on about 'the Russians' like we're some hive mind

You know the cold war is over, you guys won, plenty of Russians left when the economy went to shit and in the end Putin is the result of your foreign policy goals. I have a deep hatred for both, because of how they have impacted me personally, and it really makes me resent when people act like anyone naysaying the current regime is just doing it because they're Russian and hypnotized by Putin.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

casual xeophobia --> You lot being sore loser hard-leftists, Greenies pissed that they don’t have more of a say in government, paid actors and disinformation peddlers hired by Republicans and Russians to fragment the Left coalition like has happened time and time again (stupid ‘fall in love’ party), and of course those same Russians and Republicans who directly inject BS into our political discussion.

Dear reader, just to be clear what this poster is trying to hide in its quote. It doesn't try to refute a single word of this. No. It goes off on a tangent about how mean liberals are calling out the Russian involvement in propping up the Fascist Dictator Wannabe while tearing down Team Blue for the lulz. Despite the fact that I called out everyone in this faction trying to tear down the Left and prop up the Right, including the hard-core "Dems aren't left enough" leftists, the Greenies that only seem to pop out during the Presidential Elections to tear down the Left and give the Right a chance to steel it, useful idiots who don't realise they are being played, and the bad actors who really DO want a Single-Party Republican Dictatorship with elements taken from Handmaiden's Tale, 1984, and Hunger Games for good measure. Rather than engage or refute any of these truths, it gets all butthurt about how we distrust Russians when really, all we distrust are the Russian government, who has repeatedly put their thumb on the scale for the Authoritarian Conservatives of our country.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rather than engage or refute any of these truths, it gets all butthurt about how we distrust Russians when really,

Did you mean to call me it? cause my pronouns are right there

"I'm not xenophobic you took me out of context"

posts context

xenophobia

k

you and your dad are probably incredibly alike.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This poster doubles down. It doesn't care to show me civility or respect, and instead makes thinly veiled insults at me and my father, which of course it knows nothing about. And then it expects me to do it the kindness of taking it at face value.

Like I told the last poster that tried this tact with me, we're on the internet, where the men are men, the women are men, the children are FBI agents, of course this poster is a transgender Russian expat, and nobody, and I mean nobody knows I'm a cat. If it's going to call me a xenophobe and a conservative, then it'll have to deal with being treated as something it's not too. It can either stop being a jerk to me, or it can block me. But it won't be calling me a xenophobic conservative without SOME response, as hampered as that response may be by the rules of this community.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Your response is to misgender me, because you're mad that I'm pointing out you're just like republicans.

Just incredible, no notes

I'd post my estradiol bottle but I don't need to prove anything to someone like you

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm misgendering this poster because it insists that I am just like Republicans. Which is a fucking lie. And another violation of Rule 3. Is the poster can't take it, don't dish it. And maybe stop using its transgenderness as a cover for its incivility!

I'll let it have the last word now.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

I’m misgendering this poster because it insists that I am just like Republicans.

Scratched liberal moment.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You are misgendering me, to prove you're not like republicans. ... who would also misgender me.

You reported me to the mods for making a joke hypothetical about how if (not making accusations) you soil your pants you would find a way to blame leftists.

Whatever issues you have with your father maybe you should try projecting them online less.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)