jerkface

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

Why have kids?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

The animals we create are morally equivalent to our own children and are owed the exact same unconditional love and protection.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Religion for Breakfast has a fascinating video about how "strict" religions are more enduring and are in fact growing, while "permissive" religions falter and extinguish. Whether or not the rules are applied strictly is an entirely different issue from whether the rules are themselves positive or negative, and that seems to be lost on most commenters.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

carrying water for colonialism even though you probably don't even benefit from it. why do people act like this. like conservative working class people who keep voting for tax cuts for the rich, as though they are "temporarily inconvenienced millionaires".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm more concerned with finding a good guy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

Liberal party is centre-right already. Liberalism opposes humanism to the degree that it favours capital over human needs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What formative documents can I read to learn about this "philosophy of freedom"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, what you are saying is that black people cannot be racially offensive to other black people. What is to stop you from saying something ableist? Clearly, nothing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Context matters a lot here, because they could easily have been talking about 100 dead, not 100 icky. This is clearly a context where using death as a metaphor is beyond inappropriate. There are at least two The Office (USA) gags about exactly that concept.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Hard to imagine if he wasn't

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

The coping has already begun.

 

I love these nerds

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/31516170

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/31516123

It's happening, the worst mayor Toronto has ever had is removing three major recently completed bike lanes at tax payer expense. That's right, Ontario tax payers are footing the bill for Ford to meddle in Toronto municipal infrastructure. This is of course to distract us from failing healthcare and education while appealing to his mostly car centric base.

There is a protest happening Wed. 23rd of October, please come out if you can. https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/rally-ride-for-road-safety-tickets-1045417761667

 

The article asks the question, why does the perception exist that bike lanes cause congestion? I think it's absurd that it does not even mention the culture war and toxic masculinity, which cast cyclists as effete, virtue signalling, holier-than-thou, radical leftists, who culture warriors feel it is their duty as a Real Man to harass, discourage, and endanger.

 

Rethinking Sapience: The Case Against Speciesism in Animal Intelligence

The question of whether humans are uniquely sapient has long been a topic of philosophical, ethical, and scientific debate. Traditionally, sapience—often defined as higher-order reasoning, self-awareness, complex problem-solving, and moral agency—has been reserved for humans. Yet, this view is increasingly being challenged. Evidence shows that many animals possess remarkable cognitive abilities that rival or surpass those of humans in certain domains. By maintaining the notion that animals “fall short” of sapience, we reinforce a speciesist worldview, one that arbitrarily privileges human intelligence and undervalues the unique capabilities of other species. In fact, when we examine animal cognition more closely, we find that many non-human animals demonstrate intelligence, problem-solving skills, and memory that far exceed human abilities in their respective ecological contexts.

The Problem with Human-Centered Definitions of Sapience

Historically, sapience has been defined in human-centric terms, often focusing on abilities such as abstract reasoning, language, and moral reflection—areas where humans seem to excel. However, this definition overlooks the diverse and specialized forms of intelligence found in the animal kingdom. By measuring animal cognition against human standards, we ignore the vast array of cognitive abilities that different species have developed to thrive in their environments. This bias is a form of speciesism, akin to other forms of discrimination like racism or sexism, where one group is privileged over others based on arbitrary criteria.

Superior Animal Cognition: Examples from the Natural World

Many animals possess cognitive abilities that rival or surpass those of humans, especially in areas that are critical to their survival but not as relevant to human life. For example, dolphins and bats use echolocation to navigate and hunt, a sensory and cognitive ability that is far beyond human capacity. This sophisticated system allows them to "see" the world through sound, providing a level of spatial awareness that humans could not replicate without technology.

Similarly, Clark’s nutcrackers, a species of bird, can remember the precise locations of thousands of food caches, a feat of memory that outclasses the average human’s ability to recall such detail. Homing pigeons exhibit extraordinary navigational abilities, finding their way home over long distances even when displaced from unfamiliar locations, a task that would confound most humans without the use of modern tools.

In the ocean, octopuses are known for their incredible problem-solving abilities, adaptability, and even tool use. Their ability to navigate complex environments, solve puzzles, and escape enclosures highlights a level of intelligence that rivals human problem-solving in many situations.

Perhaps one of the most striking examples comes from our closest relatives, the great apes. In particular, chimpanzees and other apes have demonstrated vastly superior abilities in short-term memory and visual processing compared to humans. Studies have shown that young chimpanzees can outperform adult humans in memory tasks that require the rapid recall of numbers displayed briefly on a screen, a skill likely crucial to their survival in the wild. These animals not only display memory and problem-solving abilities but also exhibit complex social behaviors, tool use, and even elements of culture—factors traditionally associated with human sapience.

The Bias of Human-Centric Tests of Intelligence

A key issue in the discussion of animal intelligence is the way humans design tests for cognition. These tests often reflect human priorities and abilities rather than a fair assessment of an animal's true cognitive potential. For instance, mirror self-recognition is commonly used as a test of self-awareness. While elephants, dolphins, and great apes often pass this test, many animals do not. However, the reliance on visual self-recognition may be irrelevant for species that use other senses, like smell or sound, to identify themselves. This calls into question the fairness of using a human-oriented test to assess non-human intelligence.

Language is another area where humans are typically considered superior. While humans use complex, symbolic language, many animals have sophisticated communication systems that convey nuanced information. For example, bees use a "waggle dance" to communicate the location of food sources to other members of their hive, a highly efficient and specialized form of communication. Whales and dolphins use vocalizations that appear to contain elements of grammar and structure, suggesting forms of communication that we are only beginning to understand.

Acknowledging Animal Intelligence Without Speciesist Bias

The tendency to focus on where animals "fall short" rather than on the ways in which they excel reflects a deep-seated speciesism. By continually adjusting the criteria for sapience, we uphold the belief that humans are inherently superior, while downplaying or outright ignoring the remarkable cognitive abilities that animals possess. This narrow definition of intelligence not only skews our understanding of the animal world but also justifies harmful practices, such as exploiting animals for food, entertainment, or labor.

A more balanced approach would recognize the diverse forms of intelligence across species, each tailored to the unique demands of their environments. Just as humans excel in abstract thought and moral reasoning, other animals excel in memory, navigation, communication, and problem-solving in ways that are equally impressive. By broadening our definition of sapience, we can begin to appreciate the remarkable cognitive abilities found throughout the animal kingdom and move away from the speciesist framework that elevates human intelligence above all others.

Conclusion: The Case for Non-Human Sapience

As research into animal cognition continues to evolve, it becomes increasingly clear that many non-human animals possess forms of intelligence and problem-solving that rival or exceed human abilities. From the memory skills of birds to the communication systems of bees and dolphins, animals demonstrate a remarkable capacity for learning, adaptation, and cooperation. By recognizing these abilities, we can challenge the arbitrary lines drawn around sapience and move towards a more inclusive understanding of intelligence, one that respects and values the cognitive capacities of all species. Ultimately, breaking free from speciesism opens the door to a more ethical and compassionate relationship with the non-human world.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/29454890

The 32 countries that have formally recognized non-human animal sentience include the European Union, Switzerland, Chile, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom.

 

This number is getting pretty big. What is this, like, XP or something? Can I level up? Is it bad? Does anything happen if it gets too big?

view more: next ›