flumph

joined 2 years ago
[–] flumph 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As someone else mentioned, they had to rename due to legal concerns over trademarks. If people start abandoning Terraform for this alternative, Hashicorp will look for any reason to sue.

[–] flumph 8 points 2 years ago

DHH is a contrarian. Any benefits of the cloud he might get are overridden by the fact that he needs to be different (and blog about it).

See his stances on Typescript, workplace inclusion, TDD, etc.

[–] flumph 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, you can hit it with the forge hammer? Hot damn.

[–] flumph 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure that if there's ever a BG3:DLC or BG4, the redeemed Dark Urge SL will be canon. What with >!Withers intervention, the warning about your own offspring, etc.!<

[–] flumph 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you did a fully custom character the first time, try playing as the Dark Urge origin. There's a good story there that you wouldn't have experienced elsewise.

[–] flumph 36 points 2 years ago

A recent pilot in Prague enabled Hosts on Airbnb to trial Minut noise sensors, and found a reminder can be all that’s needed for a potential noise issue to be quickly resolved

If a reminder is all that's needed, the device could be an offline decibel meter that lights up when the volume exceeds a threshold.

Plus I'm sure parents are going to love their phone blowing up when little Billy is a bit too cranky at bed time.

[–] flumph 9 points 2 years ago

Every website hosted in the US is subject to DMCA (or directly getting sued for copyright infringement). Even if you host your own website and refuse to comply with DMCA requests, they'll just send them to your hosting provider instead.

[–] flumph 1 points 2 years ago

There's literally a column on the chart for that.

[–] flumph 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It was made by an edgelord for edgelords.

CuckCuckGo belongs in the trash instead.

[–] flumph 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You've changed the perspective to potential wait time for male passengers. That may be true but it doesn't have an adverse impact on male drivers, which is what was stated in the comment I replied to.

It is objectively always better to be in the women+ group than outside of it.

Based on Ubers data, women+ are raped five times as often in ride shares. "Objectively" I bet a lot of women+ would choose "maybe a longer wait" over "5x chance of being raped".

[–] flumph 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The protected category doesn't matter, I don't see how anyone is getting a leg up or being held back by the feature.

[–] flumph 2 points 2 years ago

The option allows customers to prioritize drivers...

Nope, it doesn't. The feature is for drivers, not passengers.

view more: ‹ prev next ›