flamingos

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Hopefully they're more attentive to this than they are for their Lemmy instance (lemmy.one).

116
Sir Arthrule (files.catbox.moe)
 
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

TERFs don't want trans people using any toilet. TERFs want to push trans people out of public life, and ideally to stop existing all together, by making existing in it as difficult as possible.

 
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

“So we pointed out, secondly, that this claim was based on entirely unfounded speculation, which also ignored factors that might result in lengthening the lives of Gazans, given the public health situation existing in Gaza prior to the war, including the extent of obesity. These factors include the possible reduction in the availability of confectionery and cigarettes.

What a ghoulish thing to say, really speaks to how nasty this man is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Soul Debt - Path of Immolation (Single)

New Voynich Code is good, but I'm going to miss ther old vocalist. Not to say the new one is bad, I think I just prefer the old one.

BUT NEW SOLD SOUL‽ This is fantastic news! I was resigned to never getting anything from them again after they said they were disbanding on Reddit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sorry if it came across that hostile, I tend to be snappy after waking up and we've had a lot of transphobia lately.

Are the terms afab/amab still okay? I try and use them as opposed to “biological women” as I heard that one could be a dogwhistle before

AFAB/AMAB are fine, encouraged even. 'Biological women' is generally used by gender critical types as a dog whistle to mean that only cis women are real women.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

My warning was very pointed and specifically about rhetoric, not the actual underlying opinions.

Give me examples on why I shouldn’t use the term “cult” here, yet how it’s okay for other users of this instance to claim a large amount of the British population is in a cult simply because of their religious beliefs..

The trans cult thing is a common talking point by transphobes to discredit the idea of being trans, that it's nothing more than brainwashing. I really don't know how you expect "I don’t know who’s leading this movement, but it starts to seem like some weird cult" to come across, but it reads like you saying anyone with a more progressive opinion to you is in a cult. It's very easy for someone to make the jump from that to believing you think trans movement more broadly is a cult, especially given you're a transmedicalist.

Also, that comment by Hossenfeffer is clearly made in jest and, unlike trans people, Christians aren't a marginalised identity in Britain.

Thirdly, this place is where I get to hear the other side. Do you really want to force me to use an echo chamber by banning me?

No, that's why I gave a warning. I don't think you appreciate how much more leeway you get because I understand you come from a conservative background. You constantly say you're bad with this and when I try to clear up the boundaries of what I consider acceptable, you accuse me of engaging in cult-like tactics. Maybe I was too curt, but I'm trying to help you. I'm trans myself, so I hope you can appreciate why I'm sensitive to this stuff.

There’s no need to read between the lines here. I barely know what “dogwhistling” is nevermind people accusing me of doing it.

I'd really appreciate if you did read up on it. I can only moderate based on what you write, not what's in your head. I and others can't tell the difference between genuine ignorance or pretending to be ignorant to sneak bigotry in under the radar. The Green Party has a good page on trans/queer dogwhistles.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Sick of acting like what, having a different opinion and telling you to fuck off when you call them part of a cult? Like, how do you expect shit like "If I was going to be a transphobe, it would be because how you lot" to be received?

Also, first and final warning, I consider the implicit 'trans cult' stuff here to be a violation of our 'no transphobia' rule.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Flax, this thing where you walk into a thread about trans issues and your only contribution is calling people crazy and pedantry is getting really old. It doesn't make you look smart, you just come across as someone trying to mask their transphobia (and no, I'm not calling you a transphobe).

 
 
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

ಠ_ಠ take your upvote

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Normally not much, but we've seen a big uptick in transphobia in wake of the Supreme Court ruling here which hasn't been fun.

 

Good day all, the Lemmy devs (the people that make the software this website runs) are currently underfunded. If you're willing and able, then it'd be greatly appreciated if you could donate to help out little corner of the internet get better.

If, for whatever reason, you don't want to support the hosting of lemmy.ml but do want to support the developers, then make donations through something other than OpenCollective.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/29579005

An open source project the size of Lemmy needs constant work to manage the project, implement new features and fix bugs. Dessalines and I work full-time on these tasks and more. As there is no advertising or tracking, all of our work is funded through donations. Unfortunately the amount of donations has decreased to only 2000€ per month. This leaves only 1000€ per developer, which is not enough to pay my bills. With the current level of donations I will be forced to find another job, and drastically reduce my contributions to Lemmy. To avoid this outcome and keep Lemmy growing, I ask you to please make a recurring donation:

Liberapay | Ko-fi | Patreon | OpenCollective | Crypto

If you want more information before donating, consider the comparison with Reddit. It began as startup funded by rich investors. The site is managed by corporate executives who over time have become more and more disconnected from normal users. Their main goal is to make investors happy and to make a profit. This leads to user-hostile decisions like firing the employee responsible for AMAs, blocking third-party apps and more. As Reddit is a single website under a single authority, it means all users need to follow the same rules, including ridiculous ones like censoring the name "Luigi".

Lemmy represents a new type of social media which is the complete opposite of Reddit. It is split across many different websites, each with its own rules, and managed by normal people who actually care about the users. There is no company and no profit motive. Much of the work is carried out by volunteer admins, mods and posters, who contribute out of enthusiasm and not for money. For users this is great as there is no advertising nor tracking, and no chance of takeover by a billionaire. Additionally there are no builtin political or ideological restrictions. You can use the software for any purpose you like, add your own restrictions or scrutinize its inner workings. Lemmy truly belongs to everyone.

Dessalines and I work fulltime on Lemmy to keep up with all the feature requests, bug reports and development work. Even so there is barely enough time in the day, and no time for a second job. Previously I sometimes had to rely on my personal savings to keep developing Lemmy for you, but that can't go on forever. We partly rely on NLnet for funding, but they only pay for development of new features, and not for mandatory maintenance work. The only available option are user donations. To keep it viable donations need to reach a minimum of 5000€ per month, resulting in a modest salary of 2500€ per developer. If that goal is reached Dessalines and I can stop worrying about money, and fully focus on improving the software for the benefit of all users and instances. Please use the link below to see current donation stats and make your contribution! We especially rely on recurring donations to secure the long-term development and make Lemmy the best it can be.

Donate

 

Zack Polanski, who has been deputy leader since 2022 and serves as a London assembly member, will challenge [Carla] Denyer and [Adrian] Ramsay this summer despite them taking the party to its best-ever general election result last year, winning four seats.

Polanski told the Guardian he believed the pair had done a good job, but that the Greens needed to meet the challenge of Reform UK, which has a membership about four times bigger than his party and surged to a mass of victories in Thursday’s local elections.

“People are done with the two old parties and we’re in this dangerous moment where Nigel Farage is absolutely ready to fill that vacuum,” Polanski said. “We should never turn into Nigel Farage. But there are things we can learn in terms of being really clear in speaking to people.

“There’s an empty space in politics, where we’re not being as bold as we can be. Being sensible and professional are good qualities. But I don’t think they should be the central qualities.”

The Greens in England and Wales have about 60,000 members, while Reform have more than 220,000, a discrepancy Polanski said indicated the need for a change of direction.

“I don’t believe there are more people in this country who align with the politics of Reform than they do with the Green party,” he said. “In fact we know that, because when Green party policies are polled, they are frequently the most-liked policies, and we are the most-liked party. So why are people not joining?

“We’re not visible enough. I don’t want to see our membership grow incrementally. I want to see us be a mass movement. There’s something here around eco-populism: still being absolutely based in evidence, science and data – and never losing that – but telling a really powerful story.”
[…]
Polanski argues the party needs to take advantage of “massive” disillusionment with the Labour government, something he said was for now mainly helping fuel support for Reform.

“If you were trying to create the circumstances for the far right to rise, you would be doing exactly what Keir Starmer is doing now, which is protecting the wealth and power of the super rich,” he said.

64
Hey guys (files.catbox.moe)
 
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

The linked linkers, because we're link aggregators that link together.

 

Opinion piece by the TUC General Secretary:

There’s no sugar-coating it: Thursday was a tough night for Labour.

Voters sent a clear message — the same one they sent at the General Election. They’re fed up with the status quo and desperately want real change. The government must listen. But it must not panic.

Labour still commands a huge parliamentary majority and a powerful electoral mandate. That mandate was won on a promise to rebuild Britain, fix broken public services, and raise living standards after 14 years of Tory failure.

That’s where the focus must remain. Now is the time to deliver — and show the country whose side Labour is on.

The Employment Rights Bill offers a powerful opportunity to do just that. This landmark legislation will transform millions of lives by banning exploitative zero-hours contracts, ending fire-and-rehire, and guaranteeing sick pay from day one.

These aren’t just good policies — they’re popular ones. They reflect the public’s deep appetite for change and stand in direct opposition to the politics of division. New polling for the TUC shows the Bill doesn’t just make moral and economic sense — it makes political sense too. Passing it will boost Labour’s standing and help cut through Nigel Farage’s hollow posturing.

Farage likes to pose as a “man of the people,” but his record tells a very different story. He ordered his MPs to vote against the biggest upgrade to workers’ rights in a generation.

He supports NHS privatisation. And he idolises dangerous strongmen like Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin — whose agendas threaten British jobs and security. Let’s take the fight to Farage where he’s weakest and expose him for what he is: a plastic patriot offering nothing but chaos and division.

Labour has nothing to gain from trying to out-Reform Reform. It will just bleed votes in both directions. But this government will be rewarded if it delivers the change working people are crying out for.

That means an unrelenting focus on the cost of living, rebuilding the NHS, improving schools, investing in skills and delivering an industrial strategy that brings good, secure work to every corner of the country.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've said this elsewhere, but there's something off about that account that I can't put my finger on. Like, what kind of Trump supporter opens up a socialism community on a UK focused forum?

 

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has published interim guidance following last week's Supreme Court decision. It instructs organisations that manage public spaces and workplaces to create segregated mixed-sex bathrooms, washing and changing facilities for Trans+ people to use.

It does this on the basis that same-sex spaces can only be used by people that align with the Supreme Court's definition of 'biological sex', while also saying that Trans+ perceived to be of the wrong gender can't use bathrooms that match their biological sex.

If taken beyond interim guidance and made statutory, it would be the biggest human rights disaster since racial segregation and apartheid.

The guidance covers workplaces, schools, and services open to the public, such as hospitals, shops and restaurants.

It stipulates that, where possible, mixed-sex toilets, washing and changing facilities should now be provided. In an interim period, it sets out where this is not possible, trans people should not be put in a position where there are no facilities for them to use.

 
 
 
view more: next ›