ericjmorey

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Discord and Reddit also had uniquely improved their UIs over the existing options.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wanted to understand their perspective. But that doesn't seem to be something they are willing to share in any more detail.

There was no implication being made.

What measure of difficulty of content discovery are you using to determine that it is difficult? What would not difficult content discovery be? What content is there is desired to be discovered What do you mean by, 'there is no "why" here'?

I have many questions about how people perceive the current state of things and what they view as potential areas for improvement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

You've made an awful lot of bad assumptions about me based on a single question that you haven't answered.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Seriously. What's up? You're responding with a great amount of negativity. You've accused me of gaslighting and being moronic with no provocation that would warrant either response.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I have presented no take.

Are you doing ok? What's bothering you?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Why do you view these as issues to be overcome?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The peering agreements are based on network traffic of the customers. Passing through costs to customers is always a thing.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Peering agreements have been around for a long time on the internet, they're part the backbone of the internet.

Peering agreements for internet traffic, what a stupid concept.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

This might be my favorite post in this community to date.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Seems like they added one

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 weeks ago

Doesn't help that they have offered no explanation at all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Are you aware of https://granary.io/? It may be helpful for implementing your ideas

 

September 25, 2017
Marc Hogan writes:

Hit-making songwriters and producers reveal the ways they are tailoring tracks to fit a musical landscape dominated by streaming.

Throughout the history of recorded music, formats have helped shape what we hear. Our ideas about how long a single should be date back to what could fit on a 45 RPM 7" vinyl record. AM radio meant mono recordings, rather than stereo, and producer Phil Spector’s Wall of Sound—with its cavernous echo and massed instruments—was built for it, offering plenty of depth through a single speaker. Video killed the radio star. Ringtones birthed the quick-hit digital chirps of snap music. The requirements for American Top 40 FM radio, in particular, grew so byzantine by the early 2010s, when blaring, mathematically precise hits reigned supreme, that an industrial-strength supply chain of super-producers and songwriters emerged to fulfill them.

And now, streaming’s promise for listeners is also a gauntlet thrown down for creators. With tens of millions of songs just a few taps away, artists must compete or be skipped. The unprecedented wealth of data that streaming services use to curate their increasingly influential playlists gives the industry real-time feedback on what’s working, but this instant data-fication in turn risks feeding back on itself. While streaming has undoubtedly coincided with a shift in the pop charts away from the caffeinated bravado of several years ago, streaming-era hits appear to be as rigidly defined and formulaic as ever—if not more so.

Read Uncovering How Streaming Is Changing the Sound of Pop

view more: next ›