the entire point of the court is to evaluate legislation against our constitution
That is not the entire point of SCOTUS. That is not even in the constitution; it is a power the court gave itself in Marbury v. Madison.
Most SCOTUS decisions are judging appeals against federal law (including the constitution). Occasionally they rule a federal law unconstitutional, but not usually.
Are you suggesting stones suffer psychological effects?
They probably know that if they put corn starch on Stonehenge they'll be in jail for a few days and get community service, but if they put spray paint on a billionaire's yacht, they'd get shot.
Lots of people who have had a stroke and should absolutely not be driving are still driving.
Because in America telling old people they can't drive is basically telling them to sit at home die sad and lonely. Or worse, move out of their status symbol suburban homes to which they have tied their entire self worth.
You can sync messages from phone to phone. https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/360007059752-Backup-and-Restore-Messages#android_transfer
There is no reason why the message sync that works from phone to phone could not be implemented on the desktop client as well.
Because she works for billionaires, not for the people. Vote blue no matter who.
I feel for the hundreds of engineers at Microsoft who have been yelling about these security issues since day one, but cannot say "I told you so" because they'd get fired.
Albany control of and intervention in local transportation decisions screws NYC just like it screws small towns with a state highway running through the center.
This is even worse than Hochul's decision to give a billion dollars of taxpayer money to billionaires to build a head injury stadium.
The customer left a $3000 tip. The customer later verified that the tip was intentional. The customer then disputed the charge.
Fun tidbit: the customer had written "Tips for Jesus" on the check.