doophy

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's kind of the problem, though. That insane cash grab is profit driven. Spez said it himself in the AMA: Reddit is profit driven. That goes beyond makiong money to survive. That's investors seeing a return on their money. That's generating value in preparation fo that big IPO. That doesn't usually mix well with the way a site like Reddit generates value: free community created content. Right now, Reddit is banking on enough users not caring about the protest, or the fact that the site is arguably on a downward trajectory. Looking valuable is more important than being valuable at this point.

Thanks Jack Welch for that kind of mentality. I hope you're burning in Hell.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Oh, I get that theory, though I'm not sure I completely agree. Either way, unless I completely misunderstand how ActivityPub works, their instance can effectively be isolated to its own little sandbox depending on how many other instances decide to share with them. Further, if you're on an instance that decides to share w/ Meta's, you can skip over to another one that doesn't. So Meta can be isolated by instance owners and/or users.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Well said. Boosted and upvoted... whatever those two things mean. Internet points to you, good sir!

I'll edit to add that the main thing you point out that I think most fediverse folks want to avoid is the investment that leads to the IPO bag of cash. When the incentive is profit, I think social media can only ever get worse for the average end user. Keeping these things small and non-corporate is great in theory, but who pays for the servers and other costs when/if it needs to scale?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Let them! There's nothing saying other instances have to federate with them. Kind of the beauty of the whole thing, really.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think helpful bots, like this one, are generally a good thing. However I also think there should be a way for a community, either an instance as a whole or a community/magazine, can register their dislike of particular bots and/or have a setting to block them. Right now, I really want to block the lemmit bot. I don't need or want my feed gummed up w/ Reddit reposts.

 

Can Reddit survive as its volunteer workforce close down subreddits and walk away from the site in protest at the management's new policies?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm surprised I don't see more of this. Especially given that they all use ActivityPub. I know kbin is different than Lemmy, but an "all-in-one" app would be great.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed. So far, I think it's my favorite of of the dedicated apps. wefwef.app is also pretty good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interestingly, I've been trying to push my HPC customers towards SLES and Ubuntu LTS. SLES has better extended support for minor releases (that doesn't cost an arm and a leg), and Ubuntu's LTS... for obvious reasons.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Normally I would agree, but it's easy for kids to misinterpret the Bible. Most of the books that are banned as just stories. Sure, you can learn something from them, but they're not passed off as guides by which to live your life. When people take the Bible literally, it can lead to some nasty outcomes.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Shocked it took them this long. I guess they had to go through the motions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It still can be! ;-)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's not. One of the remaining devs posted that they're working on getting a new Testflight invite going.

 

Google Sheet traking Lemmy & Kbin mobile clients. Anyone w/ the link can edit.

view more: next ›