diablexical

Please see my comment to OP.

Not necessarily that it’s producing none or not enough

If your body is producing “enough” then you don’t have diabetes, type 1 or 2. That’s where they are incorrect.

Not necessarily that it’s producing none or not enough

If your body is producing “enough” then you don’t have diabetes, type 1 or 2. That’s where you are incorrect.

Type 1/2 terminology came about before any understanding of the pathology. “Diabetes mellitus” specifically refers to glucosuria. Its a symptom of insulin deficiency - absolute (typical type 1) or relative (typical type 2). It’s like calling pneumonia “cough type 1” and lung cancer “cough type 2”.

When you say “not necessarily… not enough [insulin]” You managed to get wrong what diabetes is entirely - it is necessarily “not enough” insulin again whether type 1 or 2.

Regarding your question about autoimmune destruction of the pancreas- if it is happening but there is enough insulin to maintain glycemic control, then again it is not diabetes type 1 or 2. I’m not sure if there’s uniform widely accepted terminology for it but something like “pre-type 1” is reasonable for layman terms . You have to be careful though because there’s cases of folks who had an autoimmune response but it abated and they ended up not developing (type 1) diabetes.

Its better to think of diabetes as beta cell function (and insulin) +/- and autoantibodies +/-. That leads to 4 combinations, typical type 1 is -,+ and typical type 2 is +,- but the other combinations are like 10+ % of cases (mostly being +,+ as in many “typical” type 2s have some autoantibodies but still produce insulin).

Not necessarily that it’s producing none or not enough

You are confidently incorrect.

Joke is going over my head can you explain?

It is, eg lidocaine patches. It has to be injected to really do much. Not aware of any injectables that are over the counter.

The betting odds are 96% that they’ll debate. No need to sell a bridge, you stand to gain 25 to 1 if theres no debate. You are way off what the market predicts.

Source?

Its part of wada rules to which the ioc is compliant? Drug test results for these organization are often published, at least they are for my powerlifting org

SpaceX got key govt contracts early on and is the most cost competitive launcher. The comercial space program paid off tremendously for the US.

Taiwan next!

Plenty of knowledge/skill derived wealth - Eg TSMC, aerospace, software.

Nope just ran it did exactly as I said.

Full output:

Finding a SHA-512 hash with 12 leading zeros is computationally intensive and typically involves a process known as "proof of work" where many hashes are computed until one with the desired property is found. Here’s an example Python script that performs this task:

import hashlib
import itertools

def find_hash_with_leading_zeros(prefix, leading_zeros=12):
    target = '0' * leading_zeros
    for nonce in itertools.count():
        text = prefix + str(nonce)
        hash_result = hashlib.sha512(text.encode()).hexdigest()
        if hash_result.startswith(target):
            return text, hash_result

prefix = "your_prefix_here"
result_text, result_hash = find_hash_with_leading_zeros(prefix)
print(f"Text: {result_text}")
print(f"SHA-512 Hash: {result_hash}")

In this script:

• The find_hash_with_leading_zeros function generates a hash for a string consisting of a prefix and a nonce.
• It iterates through nonces (starting from 0) until it finds a hash with the specified number of leading zeros.
• Adjust the prefix variable to a string of your choice.

This process can take a long time because it requires computing many hashes until the condition is met.

Would you like to run this script, or do you need further assistance with something specific?