If the dildo is structurally sound -so mostlikly metal too - it will reduce the fall length otherwise it wont matter. You have to understand that it would be like you standing on a dildo that is inserted into someone with you full body weight and i cant state enough how much damage that would cause. I cant think of a kink with a higher risk potential beside wrongly done choking.
If you want to mitigate this slightly you would need to have a T bar that handels the weight
"Jemand" could be the owner of the company, further 5. Explicitly mentions companies so this is kinda a void argument.
Who will tell you it's a stupid idea.
I mean i never argued against that, like you already postet anubis is a way better option and not against german law afaik
Well say the person slips or gets unconcious. In that moment you basically have a metal pole that will inflict blubt trauma on this persons internal organs. To much blunt trauma on someones uterus is a lifethreatening situation. Thats why impaling was a medival death sentence.
Btw these are kinda dangerous in this form
That's out of date anyway. How about this one.
Good to know
A crawler is a data processing machine, nothing more. therefor you are disrupting dataprocessing through data. If you think its not thats ok too. I would still advise to contact your lawyer in germany if you are thinking about hosting a zipbomb
For research purposes you could make it password protected, which would make it legal, though. Like i said having one is a gray area, because the law is made extremly vague. Like i said i dont know of any judgements about it, but it is still a possibility. If you life in germany and are inclined for an archive bomb and care about your legal safety contact a lawyer beforehand
Good question i dont know tbh. Would be an interesting question for a lawyer influencer
Telecom for example does Deep PackageInspection. That is rather well kown. Derec made a statement years ago that it is normal for other european isps too. Here is a secondary source for it, i cant find the primary source anymore https://netzpolitik.org/2012/berec-studie-dpi-bei-vielen-providern-bereits-im-einsatz/
If you are succesful in disrupting some dataprocessing doesnt matter, trying to do it is illigal. If you put it there to disrupt crawlers you are trying to disrupt an entities dataprocessing.
If your isp does dpi an archive bomb is able to crash their server. Even if they have measures againt it, it is still illigal because trying it is illigal.
I mean i am not a lawyer.
In germany we have § 303 b StGB. In short it says if you hinder someone elses dataprocessing through physical means or malicous data you can go to jail for up to 3 years . If it is a major process for someone you can get up to 5 and in major cases up to 10 years.
So if you have a zipbomb on your system and a crawler reads and unpacks it you did two crimes. 1. You hindered that crawlers dataprocessing 2. Some isp nodes look into it and can crash too. If the isp is pissed of enough you can go to jail for 5 years. This applies even if you didnt crash them due to them having protection against it, because trying it is also against the law.
Having a zipbomb is part of a gray area. Because trying to disrupt dataprocessing is illegal, having a zipbomb can be considered trying, however i am not aware of any judgement in this regard
Edit: btw if you password protect your zipbomb, everything is fine
At least in germany having one of these on your system is illegal
Dass sind vorallem Blässhühner, die bauen immer auf wasser und brauchen dazu nichtmal Treibholz oder wasserpflanzen. Dass sind für sie nur Beihilfen oder zum verankern. Natürlich tun das die wenigsten Vögel und Blässhühner sind da besonders (aber nicht einzigartig, flamingos bauen nester z.b. auch in seichtes wasser oder schlick) Worauf ich aber eigentlich hinweisen wollte: Die meisten vögel bauen ihre nester nicht in Bäume sondern in dichte Hecken/Sträucher
Well going by the title ... i mean technically that is possible with all monitors