cadekat

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'm an older generation and (generally) refrain from swearing myself, but seeing censored posts on Lemmy drives me fucking insane. This isn't a preschool nor is it an advertiser-friendly place. We should keep it that way.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago

Horus Guard from Stargate

Horus Guard represent!

 
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago

https://youtu.be/8dIdYkwWg_g

Taken a little out of context, but still funny.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you're suggesting something like cryptocurrency or a return to the gold standard, I challenge you to explain how that would help in this situation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

It's 2024. It's rude not to jam your tongue in there!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

But you couldn't release your own projects based on this under pure MIT or Apache-2.0. Presumably you'd need to include the same restriction about selling on Atlassian's marketplace.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Arguably Thomas Riker is the evil one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

A cryptocurrency without crypto is just a currency then?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Regardless of whether it's eroding trust in cryptography today, I still assert it was a reasonable choice when the term was coined. Cryptocurrency depends fundamentally on cryptography.

just because it uses sha256 as it's proof of work doesn't make it crypto, as it was essentially picked out of a hat.

You could probably switch proof-of-work to use some non-cryptographic primitive with similar properties (maybe protein folding?) and it would still serve the same purpose, ignoring the economic problems. I will concede that point.

Bitcoin still cannot function without cryptography. Each UTXO is bound to a particular key pair. Each block refers to its parent using a hash. If either of those were switched to a non-cryptographic primitive, there would be no way to authenticate the owner of a UTXO, nor would there be a way to prove the ordering of blocks. Removing cryptography from cryptocurrency would make it entirely useless as a currency.

And for the signing of transactions, are we going to start calling bank checks crypto?

Banks existed for a thousand years without the existence of cryptography. If you removed cryptography from RCS, you'd still have the rest of the standard for messaging.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I hate to be that guy, but Bitcoin uses elliptic curve cryptography to sign transactions, and SHA256 is definitely in the field of cryptography. While cryptocurrency isn't purely cryptography, it is cryptography plus economics. Borrowing the "crypto" prefix, at least in my opinion, is reasonable.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

This is a government office. A government should be able to build the technical knowledge required to keep a private signing key secure.

I do agree that individual-to-individual cryptography is more difficult, but how often do you need to check the authenticity of a document from a friend or acquaintance, digital or otherwise?

 
41
Mask of Human Rule (artlogic-res.cloudinary.com)
 
 

Hey Ottawa! Bit of a long shot, but does anyone here know of a Pathfinder Society playgroup in town? I'd love to find one to join. Thanks!

 
 
 

Ottawa police are investigating a Saturday night shooting at a wedding reception that left two Toronto men dead and injured six others.

 

Ottawa police are investigating a Saturday night shooting at a wedding reception that left two Toronto men dead and injured six others.

 

Ontario’s education minister said he believes “parents must be fully involved” if their child chooses to use a different pronoun at school.

The comments were made at a news conference on Monday morning, where Stephen Lecce was outlining the changes students and parents can expect at Ontario schools come September.

They also come as Saskatchewan adopts a new gender and pronoun policy, joining New Brunswick in legislating parental consent for students under the age of 16 who want to change their given names and/or pronouns at school.

“I think we understand though that parents must be fully involved and fully aware of what's happening in the life of their children,” Lecce said.

“I mean, often there are health implications, and I think we have to respect the rights of parents and recognize that these can be life-changing decisions, and I think parents want to be involved so that they can support their kids. And I think that's a really important principle that we must uphold.

Lecce prefaced this by saying that schools should be safe for all children. He noted that teachers and school boards take home environments into account “where there are exceptional circumstances” or “situations of potential harm to the child.”

“Educators are well versed on exactly what to do and who to turn to if they believe that child may be harmed for whatever reason, or whatever circumstance,” he said.

“But as I say, as an overarching value system, I really do believe that parents need to be fully aware, fully engaged. And school boards need to be transparent with parents. I mean, they are the legal guardians. They love their kids. They want to be aware of what's happening in the life of their children in their schools.”

The minister would not say if this were something his government would legislate, saying only that this was the “province’s position on the matter.”

A new poll by Angus Reid released Monday, which surveyed 3,016 Canadian adults online, suggests that about 43 per cent of Canadians believe parents should both be informed and give consent if a child wants to change how they are identified within a school setting.

In Ontario, 43 per cent of survey respondents said parents must both be informed and give consent of an identity change, while 34 per cent said parents should simply be informed.

About 16 per cent of respondents said it should solely be up to the child.

The Toronto District School Board currently has a policy that protects the privacy of transgender and gender non-conforming students, recognizing that some children may not be open about their identity at home.

It notes that a school “should never disclose a student’s gender non-conformity or transgender status to the student’s parent(s)/guardian(s)/caregiver(s) without the student’s explicit prior consent.”

“This is true regardless of the age of the student.”

The policy says that school staff should consult the student as to how to identify them when communicating with their guardian.

School boards in Saskatchewan have asked the province to pause its gender and pronoun policy in order to allow for a “complete review and report” prior to implementation, arguing it could have safety risks and could violate charter rights.

As of last week, the Saskatchewan government has not backtracked on its position.

view more: next ›