Zalack

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Why would you assume consciousness is a fundamental force rather than an emergent property of complex systems built on the forces?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My point was that Star Wars has been tied to the same characters for personal and business reasons, not inherently creative ones defined by the setting. The difference IMO is mostly down to who the creators and executives involved in the process of each IP have been, not the actual merits of the respective IP's worlds.

If Gene Roddenberry has decided that Next Generation had to be about Kirk and his crew, and then Paramount also mandated all it's other Star Trek projects to be about TOS crew, we'd be having the same discussions about "why can't Start Trek get away from the original series?" even though it has nothing to do with the setting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

No offense meant, because you raise a lot of good points on why Star Trek works as a setting, but I fundamentally disagree with the Star Wars take here. Historically, Star Wars has centered around the Skywalker saga for Personal (George Lucas) and Business (Disney) reasons, not creative ones.

Star Wars offers an excellent setting with a framework to discuss ethics and morality baked directly into the universe. Stories like Knights of the Old Republic have shown that you can get away from the main Saga and still tell an engaging story rooted in the universe that Saga created. Tons of old Legends content didn't tie directly into the original films and were excellent.

Andor has also shown that it's also just that bad writing is what leads to IP burnout. I couldn't finish Book of Boba Fett or Mandalorian season 3, but have watched Andor 3 times.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think the problem is that there is less often something to be said if you agree. Every now and then you might have something to add that fleshes out the idea or adds additional context, but generally if I totally agree with a comment I just upvote it.

On the other hand, when you disagree with something your response will, by logical necessity, be different from the parent comment.

So if you want to prioritize "adding something novel" there's a logical bias towards comments that disagree since only some percentage of agreement will tick that box.

Otherwise you end up with a bunch of comments that literally or figuratively add up to "this".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

More good options is always a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yup, I remember the D20 modern rulebook alternated using "he/him" and "she/her" throughout the text. One class section would use "he/him" to describe the archetypical character for that class, and the next would use "she/her".

I remember it left an impression on me as a teenage boy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The FBI and regular police have very different standards. I definitely think this should be fully investigated like any use is force, but I have more faith that the FBI handled this appropriately than of it had been a local PD department.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not a treasure

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Thatsthejoke.jpeg.zip

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

In many cases it should be fine to point them all at the same server. You'll just need to make sure there aren't any collisions between schema/table names.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not saying there aren't downsides, just that it isn't a totally crazy strategy.

view more: ‹ prev next ›