TechyDad

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago (2 children)

One big lesson from Trump's presidency was that many of the rules we thought constrained politicians were only "Gentlemen's Agreements." They held up because everyone agreed to abide by them. When Trump walked in, refused to abide by them, and wasn't immediately struck by the political equivalent to lightning from heaven, all the politicians on the right decided that they could toss those pesky rules aside also.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'd call it a "flawed democracy." The ideals behind it were sound, but the execution left much to be improved upon. And we've made many improvements (though we still have a ways to go).

Still, even a flawed democracy is preferable to Dictator Trump.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago

I want to say "Well, the military won't comply with those commands" and maybe they wouldn't, but if we even get into that position we're in deep trouble.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Hey, we can't let kids know what words mean!

Bans the dictionary

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The lying bit is where he claims that he'll only be a dictator for one day. How many dictators have given themselves ultimate power and then gave it up willingly after a single day?

If Trump regains office, he'll assert dictatorial powers. Maybe we can survive this via a mass uprising, but it's unlikely. It would be like needing to survive open heart surgery, chemotherapy, and five organ transplants all at once. Could a patient survive this? Maybe, but the prognosis wouldn't be good and even if they did, they'd be in horrible shape for quite a long time.

The best way of surviving Trump is to make sure he never gets close to the White House (or any other position of power) ever again. And, while we're at it, vote against any Republican who kisses up to Trump. (So, basically, all of them.)

[–] [email protected] 84 points 8 months ago

"I'd totally murder people, but that evil federal government would lock me up for murder? Can you believe the audacity?!!! I really want to murder these people, but they won't let me. Total government overreach! Whatever happened to states' rights?"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Big strong men come up to him, with tears in their eyes, saying "how do you do it, sir? How do you lose so many lawsuits?!!!"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Jail time in such a contempt is usually issued as "suspended" meaning that it's ordered, but if the person doesn't fuck up for a period, and obeys the final order, then they don't actually have to go to jail.

So all Trump would need to do would be good and not act up?

He's going to prison!

[–] [email protected] 71 points 8 months ago (7 children)

My guess (also not a lawyer) is to render the verdict as appeal proof as possible. If he wasn't allowed to speak, he would have claimed that his rights were violated and if he had been allowed to give the closing remarks himself, he would have been found totally Innocent.

Engoron let him talk relatively briefly, cut him off when it was clear he wasn't staying on topic, and closed off this appeal argument.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In many of the cases that Republicans refuse abortions for, there is no baby at the end. If a woman is at risk of dying and the fetus has such severe abnormalities that it will breathe twice and die, then what's the argument against an abortion? It could save the woman's life and wouldn't "kill a baby" (even if I accepted that abortion killed a baby - which I don't).

But the Republican line seems to be that a woman needs to be actively dying before they'll even start to consider allowing her to have a life saving medical procedure.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Also, it is easy to say "I'm not voting for Biden, I want someone else" right now. There aren't any consequences.

But come November and suddenly the consequences become more immediate. Many more people say they will vote third party than actually do it once in the voting booth.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago

I knew I recognized that expression.

"Are you pooping?"

"Nnnnnnoooo?"

"You're pooping aren't you?"

"Not anymore!"

 

I think my Four Seasons LEGO build is done. Only one problem: I likely won't be able to build this beyond this BrickLink Studio render. I uploaded it to BrickLink to price out the build. It would cost $96 to buy all the parts (and that's before shipping). This definitely isn't in my budget. ☹️

Maybe I could one of the sections and just swap out the season pieces. That would be more like $25 plus shipping. Still pricey, but closer to my budget.

 

I like to design biomes for my minifigures. For example, the Orc and Rocking Horse girl from a recent CMF series share a build. The Orc, having come through a portal to the little girl's room, is playing on the rocking horse. Meanwhile, the little girl has taken the orc's cloak, sword, and shield to head through the portal.

I'm now working on what might be my most ambitious MOC. I have 3 minifigures that I realized represent seasons: Watermelon Guy (summer), Turkey Guy (Fall), and Snowman (Winter). If I get a Spring, I have all 4 seasons.

My first thought was to build 4 similar MOCs that would vary due to the seasons. It turned out that this would be too costly, though.

That's when I came up with a better idea. Each figure would be standing near a big tree. Each side would represent a season and you'd be able to rotate the tree to see the different seasons.

One problem: How do you build a MOC that can rotate? I don't need it to automatically rotate or use gears or anything. Just plain "push on the MOC to rotate it" works.

Any ideas?

 

I've been struggling with something for a while now and ironically a sitcom from the 80's finally helped me pinpoint the problem. My TV was on for background noise and I noticed that it was an episode of Family Ties. In the episode, Elyse Keaton was having a problem. A prominent building that she designed was being torn down and replaced by a cookie cutter mini-mall. She was struggling with her "legacy" - her mark on the world - disappearing. After the building was gone, what evidence would there be that Elyse Keaton was there?

I'm facing a similar issue. I don't like getting into my day job too much online (for various reasons), but suffice it to say that applications that I developed for decades are being sunset/replaced. I've developed quite a lot over the decades, but eventually it would all be replaced. Once it is, what will I have as "proof that TechyDad was here"?

How do you handle the existential crisis of our works being digital and transient versus having an actual, physical product?

 

I got a Wizard minifigure from my LEGO store for free on my birthday and decided to do what I've been doing with all my minifigures - build him a biome.

This is what I have so far in BrickLink Studio. What do you think?

 

Let's suppose that you didn't know either technology and were offered the chance to work with one or the other. Time for you to get up to speed on the technology was built into the project.

Which technology would you work with and why? Which would have more options in the future?

Yes, this is a real life situation I'm confronting. I'm deep in a Java training course but a .Net opportunity has come my way. Do I toss Java/Spring Boot aside for .Net? Or do I continue with Java/Spring Boot and decline the .Net opportunity?

 

Russia has taken to chemically lowering its soldiers' inhibitions to guarantee these ill-trained civilians and convicts continue to fight no matter the odds in the ongoing war in Ukraine, according to a UK defense think tank.

 

We took Dewey the Parakeet for his annual vet appointment. He was nervous during the car ride, but handled it well all things considered. (I tried to keep the ride as smooth as possible, but turns, stops, bumps, etc were inevitable.)

While waiting for the vet, he let his daddy (my son) scratch his face. There were a few loud dogs but Dewey took it in stride.

Dewey only really got nervous when we went in the room. I think he remembered last time in that room. Sure enough "towel lady" (the vet's assistant) grabbed him with a towel and held him still. This doesn't hurt him, but he was not amused.

The doctor checked him out and was very happy with his plumage and how healthy he looked. His nails didn't even need to be trimmed because apparently Dewey has learned how to keep them trim all on his own. Then, Dewey was weighed (which he really didn't like). He's no longer a 35 gram bird. Now he's a big boy at 43 grams! (All muscle, though. Not fat.)

After a quick trip home, Dewey relaxed and calmed down. Such a brave little guy!

view more: next ›