Snowcano

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I, too, happened to me: Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, yes. I know ~~some~~ none of these words.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

What a terrible day to be literate

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Rest easy, friend. We do.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The SS Minnow with the nacelles is killing me. 🤣

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

the fact that the camera crew seemed to like focusing on them being intimate makes my brain say, "this must be important to 23rd century humans in some way".

Might I also suggest that another possibility is that until very recently, there has been so little gay representation on TV that merely depicting it at all, as Discovery has done, can feel jarring to some.

A friend of mine was complaining about the same thing back on Season 1, but I asked him if it had been a hetero couple shown brushing their teeth together or having a smooch would he have minded and he admitted probably not. We chalked it up to just not being used to seeing that with a gay couple on tv.

Just a thought.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Precisely, the grammar of cinema is not 1:1 with real life.

That said, I don’t mind making light of it for meme chuckles.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I just popped into the comments to make sure this had been posted. Good work, carry on.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you sure it’s not just for the upcoming Voyager documentary? Kind of like how they did a few select scenes of DS9 for What We Left Behind?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You disgust me, O'Connor. You wanna know why you disgust me? 'Cause you're a bleeder. You bleed too much. You’re a messy bleeder!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This actually looks pretty cool for a game of this genre.

view more: ‹ prev next ›