Showroom7561

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Research from Japan suggests high-speed rail can help ease the cost of housing and congestion on the roads, by making it easier to live further from urban centres.

Doug Ford is rolling his eyes. Don't you guys know? Bike lanes are the reason we have so much congestion, unaffordable housing, and homelessness! /s

But in all seriousness, all the things that other countries have done with great success are all things we can implement in Canada: high-speed rails, REMOVING cars from cities, improving public transportation networks, expanding cycling infrastructures, and creating more room for public spaces, as examples.

We only need the political will to, since I'm sure most people would want to live in a better version of what they have now.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just wait until everyone is forced to wear screens on their faces 24/7, because that's the way tech companies want us to live. I'm not being sarcastic, either.

There's a reason why so many people consciously choose to “disconnect” when they want a mental break. If we are no longer able to, how healthy do you think our society will be?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Argh. Was it always like that, or is this recent?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I do, but in reality, It doesn't seem to matter what cyclists do or wear. If someone driving a car (or large SUV) isn't paying attention, they won't see you.

In countries where cycling is taken seriously, their lights are not bright (to meet standards) and you don't see anyone in high-viz gear.

Blaming cyclists for something a motorist failed to do seems to be a uniquely North American thing. Even the way our news gets reported seems to always word things in a way that puts the cyclist (the victim) in the wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

but that’s more about the pressure from the clamp, not the weight of the bike.

That's what I've always assumed.

In that case, I like the idea... now I need a multi-million dollar mansion with 20ft tall ceilings to make it happen! LOL

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What you describe is really common, and it uses "jaywalking" as a weapon to target minorities and those in low-income neighbourhoods.

On the podcast "The War on Cars", this topic came up with examples showing how jaywalking becomes an excuse to target blacks.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago (9 children)

The history of "jaywalking" is pretty interesting.

Basically, it's a made-up thing designed to blame pedestrians for motorists being dangerous.

Kind of like when motorists "can't see" cyclists while looking down at their phones, because it's up to the cyclist to have on enough high-viz clothing, reflectors, bright lights, and a billboard saying "I'M HERE!!!!".

In most places, even when people think that jaywalking is illegal, it's actually not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Friend, around here any road marked 40 km/h or more is treated as a 100 km/h road 😂

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Is it wise to store your bike with its entire weight pulling on the top tube like that?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

"Thok" is the least Italian sounding brand name I've ever come across. 😂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

This is not personal emissions of billionaires, its including their businesses.

The Oxfam report says that private planes and "superyachts" are contributing factors, as well as investments in polluting industries like oil and mining.

Nowhere does it mention that their businesses are what's contributing to their carbon footprint. They are explicitly talking about their lifestyle choices.

So, I'm not sure where you got that info from, but if they are including businesses that these billionaires run, I'd be interested in seeing that data.

Mind you, the majority of these billionaires are in software... a business that's very easy to convert over to a carbon-neutral model, especially with their resources.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Yes, my Tern folding bike has a Shimano Claris 1x8, and it's been smooth and trouble-free for over 5000km so far!

To be honest, "low end" and "high end" doesn't really mean "one will work and the other won't". I think people assume that entry-level means it's crap. Really, you're only paying for a lighter and faster shifting system, often with fewer jumps between cogs, when you spend more money.

Any components that are dialed in will work regardless of where they fall on the spectrum.

 

“They are not safe. They are anything but for safety,” said a woman who added vehicles in the two-block section sometimes drive in the middle of Springbrook to avoid the bollards.

Oh, so drivers behind of the wheel of an automobile are the danger. Why remove the bike lanes rather than the car lanes?

I heard that Etobicoke's NIMBYs are insane, but this is a new level of stupidity from Richmond Hill.

 

Walking my grandkid to/from school, it absolutely floors me how many dangerous drivers there are around kids.

In a matter of maybe 10 minutes, I've witnessed:

  • at least a dozen cars illegal parked. It's not the parking that bothers me, but the fact that these cars are often parked on turns or just before intersections, making it impossible for other drivers to see small kids.
  • Several people not stopping at stop signs, including at the exit of the school parking lot.
  • One car, who completely blew through a stop sign at the front of the school, made a left turn and nearly hit a guy walking his kid. The driver didn't even slow down.
  • Super fucking huge pickup trucks parked in the school parking lot, but their long ass hangs well over the sidewalk near the kindergarden area, leaving very little space to use the sidewalk.
  • Speeding. Obviously, you have to have speeding in school zones, right?

This happens every day, during drop off and pick up. I was told that bylaw were “cracking down”, but no, they aren't. If they were, our municipality would generate $5000 in fines each and every day at every school.

The other day, I rode my bike past another school as kids were getting out. Not only was their massive parking lot completely full, but they had blocked the bike trail (WITH PYLONS) to make space for more cars. Then as I entered onto the road, cars were illegally parked along the road and on a bridge for a like 100m. Making it extremely difficult and dangerous to cross because they blocked visibility for me and other drivers on the road.

I asked the cross guard if these students all lived out of town, requiring every parent to drive them home; he obviously didn't get my joke.

Seriously, fuck cars. All of them!

 

Been watching the Q&A with this guy... total clown. He evaded every question about bike lanes and keeps pounding the idea that "We will always be building! [more roads]".

I will tell you one thing, I'm not usually one to take the lane unless absolutely necessary, but I'd be happy to do so every time in protest of any Ontario's proposed actions to go backwards on sane, cycling infrastructure.

Also, the focus is always about reducing congestion and gridlock... guys, YOU ARE THE CONGESTION AND GRIDLOCK! Stop making cars the only way to travel, and you'll magically solve your problem.

 

Toronto, please don't normalize hit-and-runs.

 

"She said she didn’t see us. Didn’t see us. She was very, very upset."

The driver did stop and is not expected to be charged.

This makes me furious, but it's completely expected.

Cars are the only weapon where you can kill someone without consequence, even if it was pure negligence or entirely on purpose.

 

"She said she didn’t see us. Didn’t see us. She was very, very upset."

The driver did stop and is not expected to be charged.

This makes me furious, but it's completely expected.

Cars are the only weapon where you can kill someone without consequence, even if it was pure negligence or entirely on purpose.

 

In my persistence to fit Linux in my life, I'm curious if some "must have" Windows software will work better if I just ran a Windows VM within Linux.

None of the software I need to work is needed to work continuously. They are basically programs that I fire up when needed, for a few minutes, then exited.

Wine will install them, but not run them, so I'm hoping a VM is the answer as I'm not interested in dual-booting to run a few Windows programs occasionally.

 
 

Also, "identical" has a different meaning here.

There's a special place in hell for the monster who dreamed up this captcha!

 

I've been trying out NextDNS and comparing it to Adguard DNS (adguard-dns-.io), but unlike NextDNS, Adguard DNS' query log is quite vague, and I can't even tell if it's doing anything.

99% of the listed items in the Adguard DNS query log show up as "Processed", but the request clearly shows either advertiser or tracking as the categories.

It seems that unless I actually click BLOCK, the status doesn't really list these requests as Blocked, except for a very small number.

Is this normal behaviour? I assume any requests showing "processed" but not "blocked" are still going through, which is bad. NextDNS shows these same requests clearly as blocked or not, so at least I know that it's working.

Anyone have any thoughts, or clarification on how it works?

 

I'm talking about the ads that look like listings, but they have a small "AD" text on the corner.

These ads are often grotesque and offensive, and I'd rather not see them at all.

I've tried various block lists, but it's not removing them.

MORE CONTEXT: Sorry, I should have been more specific!

The gross/offensive ads seem to only be in the Aliexpress app (Android).

On the mobile and desktop browser version, I still get the "AD" listings, but they are of products related to things I've purchased or browse through (all bike related items). I'd like to get rid of those, too, but I guess the ones in the app are the worst type.

I do have Adguard for Android set to filter HTTPS requests from the Ali app, so I figure it's just a matter of finding the right filter. Hopefully, anyway!

 

The upgraded model has the same low-end adjustability and a wider wide vs the old style. Yet, it's only compatible with 27.5 - 29"?

Typo?

view more: ‹ prev next ›