Ropianos

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Och tyska med! Jättekonstigt, det här ett svenskt forum.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I guess that was a bit of a strawman. Obviously mass extinctions are bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Sorry, I meant "destroy the planet" as in lifeless/only single celled organisms.

And you can kind of see humanity as "just another big asteroid impact". Nature will recover competeley over the next million years or so. That's what I meant with mass extinctions being kind of inconsequential for the planet as a whole on geological time scales.

Obviously mass extinctions are also bad besides their effect on human society, I just meant that that is mostly a spiritual one thats hard to measure, about lost potential and eradicating a species. As a thought experiment, is eradicating a disease, a form of life, inherently negative? Mosquitoes? Do you agree that it's a big achievement that we eradicated small pox? What if we eradicate all existing diseases?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Well, survive yes. But self-sufficiency is a big problem. The world is nowadays so interconnected that even a problem in only one region can severely affect all of humanity (e.g. semiconductors from Taiwan). So yes, a collapse of our modern society is certainly possible.

Destroying the planet is not really a thing. Mass extinctions in the past were a big deal but at the same time: Earth recovered. We only have a big problem because the plants/animals we need might go extinct.

Obviously valuing nature and wildlife diversity in and of itself is good but it doesn't have any intrinsic value in regards to supporting society.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Obviously it's a skill issue but don't you ever make mistakes? If Rust prevents some bugs and makes you more productive, what is not to like? It's a new language and takes time to learn but the benefits seem to outweigh the downsides now and certainly in the long run (compared to C at least).

Maybe Torvalds didn't give in to public opinion but made an informed choice?

The crates are a bit of a problem and I think Rust is a bit overhyped for high-level problems (it still requires manual memory management after all) but those are not principal roadblockers, especially in the kernel.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You can understand it but you can't interpret the value. How many movies is a CD? Or a DVD? Or a 1TB SSD? Or even Avatar in 3D (presumably not 1)? How many movies have even been released in total/last year?

The number awes non-tech savvy folk but it doesn't really inform them of anything. You could just as well write "more movies than you will ever need".

And besides that, I personally think that news should try to educate folk. I'm completely fine with a comparison in the article. But why in the headline?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Fair point. I personally think that AI lives up to enough parts of the hype so that there won't be another AI winter but who knows. Some will obviously get disillusioned but not enough.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (9 children)

There are quite a lot of AI-sceptics in this thread. If you compare the situation to 10 years ago, isn't it insane how far we've come since then?

Image generation, video generation, self-driving cars (Level 4 so the driver doesn't need to pay attention at all times), capable text comprehension and generation. Whether it is used for translation, help with writing reports or coding. And to top it all off, we have open source models that are at least in a similar ballpark as the closed ones and those models can be run on consumer hardware.

Obviously AI is not a solved problem yet and there are lots of shortcomings (especially with LLMs and logic where they completely fail for even simple problems) but the progress is astonishing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Also in Stockholm ist nicht alles perfekt aber du übertreibst schon etwas. Man beantragt keine Wohnung, man meldet sich bei Wartelisten für die komplette Stadt an. Und einen so extremen Mangel gibt es hier auch nicht, bspw. Studentenwohnungen mit geteilter Küche gibts gerade ausreichend in Stockholm (mit 1 Queuetag bekommt man ein Zimmer in manchen Wohnheimen, mit 90 in den meisten). Verglichen mit München ein Traum.

Ganz abgesehen davon finde ich Wartelisten als Konzept sehr gut (auch wenn es mich persönlich in Stockholm etwas benachteiligt). Die Frage ist wer bei einer Wohnungsknappheit eine Wohnung bekommen sollte. In Stockholm sind es die die schon lange in der Stadt wohnen (d.h. viele Wartetage haben) und nicht, wie in den meisten anderen Städten, die die am meisten Geld haben.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Surreale Fabel triffts ganz gut, kein einziger Satz war was ich erwartet habe. Respekt!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Das ist, wenn ich mich nicht täusche, dir Definition von Apartheid.

Ja, eine Art der Diskriminierung hat dort aufgehört. Die Enteignungen gingen bspw. aber weiter.

Stimmt schon. Aber "Two wrongs don't make a right". Ein Terrorangriff rechtfertigt nicht komplett Gaza dem Erdboden gleich zu machen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Ich verstehe nicht genau was du meinst. Der Begriff Apartheid bezieht sich darauf dass Palästinenser systematisch benachteiligt werden in Israel. Nicht nur in den Anfangsjahren, nicht nur am Ende. Die komplette Zeitspanne über.

Und ich weiß nicht genau wo du aus dem Wikipediaausschnitt "sehr gut integriert" herausliest? Oder meinst du dass Teile des/der Ausschnitt nicht stimmt?

Und nach 68 wurde es eigentlich nicht wirklich besser. Wenn du enteignet wirst um auf deinem Grund jüdische Israelis anzusiedeln klingt das nach Apartheid und nicht nur Problemen mit der Wohnungssuche. Um direkt aus dem Paper Südafrikas zu zitieren: "In 1967, Israel purportedly annexed occupied East Jerusalem to its territory, and in 1980, it incorporated a provision into its Basic Law claiming Jerusalem ‘united’ as the capital of Israel, a move censured by the United Nations Security Council as “null and void” and to “be rescinded forthwith”.133 Since 1967, Israel has constructed 279 ‘settlements’ for Israeli civilians across the West Bank — including 14 settlements in East Jerusalem — appropriating 750,000 dunums (185,329 acres) of Palestinian land.134 The United Nations Security Council has repeatedly declared that the establishment of such settlements by Israel has “no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-State solution and a just, lasting and comprehensive peace”.135 Regardless, the number of Israeli settlers transferred into the West Bank (including East Jerusalem) has increased dramatically from an estimated 247,000 at the time of the Oslo Accords,136 to over 700,000 in 2023.137 The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (‘ICC’) has determined that there is “a reasonable basis to believe” that “members of the Israeli authorities have committed war crimes… in relation, inter alia, to the transfer of Israeli civilians into the West Bank."

view more: next ›