Yes exactly.
Psyhackological
So reading all of your responses
- Tested and preinstalled hardware
- One resource to solve the issue not many
- Customizablity when needed
- Easy rollback when something breaks
- Changing people mindset that Linux isn't for desktops
Does anyone have more?
- Feeling clean
- Not being exploited
- Minimalism
- Less power drain
- Less data sent
- Freedom
- Everything works better and faster
- I hate spying because they can
- To be honest also because most people don't care
The only con is convenience.
I've also seen creating there deployment or configuration stack of your choice.
Yeah exactly.
But what about casual usage like office? The option to choose OS preinstalled on the laptops or desktop would be beneficial.
But Microsoft holds its monopolistic grip.
Maybe we are too used to Linux working on anything but with some imperfection.
And yet it again leads to oficial supported hardware.
They are getting closer to this but also I think those projects emerged from being old and unorganized so they want to do it decently.
Yes, but also companies say that Linux support is not worth it (gaining money and spending on the support) compared to - slapping barely working Windows port and call it a day.
For now Linux support is more like pleasant surprise than a official respected thing.
For me it was always a niche that wasn't taken full advantage of.
Let me clarify myself
*It's impossible to get big corporate guys attention so they ship Linux by default and it's clearly tested. For now the Valve, System76, Framework and Tuxedo are exception.
Edit: Also I was keeping in mind corporate entity behind OS.
- Apple - MacOS
- Microsoft - Windows
- ? - Linux
List me what is standardized on Linux.
Hahaha true ๐
But the scale is too small for now. :/