PizzaMane

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (7 children)

I am not lacking a place to discuss, once again you have misunderstood. My issue with it is that this place is an echo chamber.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (9 children)

You misunderstand, I am stating that rule 2 is a dumb ass rule.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (11 children)

It's easier for them to post this than say, the news about Aaron Bushnell. Why face something uncomfortable when things thar confirm your bias are around?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

they want marriage to be defined as a man and a woman

Exactly.

Is that your earth-shattering evidence?

It crossed my mind to link more, but I knew you wouldn't even be able to handle this one. Best to stick to one at a time, lest you ignore the rest as you often do.

That is from 2016, but it is the current platform.

If it doesn't represent the GOP, then they shouldn't have it on their site. They chose to keep it up because that bigotry hasn't changed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

https://prod-static.gop.com/media/Resolution_Platform.pdf

See the sections on "Defending Marriage", and "Marriage, Family, and Society"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

intolerance which isn’t tied to any political platform.

Except for the GOP platform. Being anti gay, anti trans, etc is all wrapped up in it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I get stock as part of my job.

I thought you were self employed? You must be one of those gay black men with trans friends.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Quoting Forbes for this is hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Also you are confusing earnings with dividends.

I never mentioned either of them, because i am not talking about the literal specifics of how the wealth is distributed. You have no point here.

You mean facts and logic.

No. You are getting hung up on the actual methods of how the wealth is distributed, cherrypicking the ways in which it is not as a means to say that the rich aren't extracting wealth.

Your argument relies on fallacies the whole way through.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (6 children)

When they sell something. It doesn’t go into the pocket of Elon. It does into the funds of the company. For every Tesla sold. Elon receives zero dollars.

Again, you're getting hung up on literal cash. Cash is not the only form of wealth. And the rich get their wealth from these companies. Sometimes it is literal cash, but most often it is in the form of stocks.

And the wealth these companies earn disproportionately goes to the rich, the stock holders, upper management, etc.

Elon owns zero factories. Same with bezos. Neither own any of those items.

The rich own the companies that own the production. I know you're more intelligent than this.

Zero dollar goes to either one

Again, you're getting hung up on the distinction between cash, stock, and wealth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

"Fossil fuel exec says Supreme Court should limit government power on climate policy"

view more: ‹ prev next ›