PieFed looks so amazing! And it is fantastic how it continues to be developed more all the time.
Though it still lacks numerous features found on Lemmy - e.g. being able to search for users (I tried searching for one of my favorite people to talk to, lvxferre, and many variations such as @[email protected], but piefed.social came up with nothing - it seems to search only within the text fields, and I saw nothing in any of the dropdowns to look for a "user", or a "community", etc.). Likewise I tried to find existing posts in that search bar - e.g. https://lemmy.world/post/21055894 "Lemmy's gaining popularity, so I thought new people should see this." but again could not. Another one is that the frontend UI needs some polish, e.g. on this post I literally cannot see the name of the community (no matter how far I zoom out), only that it begins with "[META] Piefeโฆ" (oh wait no, now I see, at https://ponder.cat/post/326806 - that's the name of the post? but then why is it repeated like that, in tiny font, right next to / above the huge font, and also cut off - wouldn't it make more sense to just stop the list at "[email protected]"? or if it is important enough to add, then not to cut it off?)
Minor issues of polish aside, the USA election season is coming up so... this makes me wonder: can you block users from a given list of instances using PieFed? e.g. if I wanted to block users, and I mean all of communities, posts, comments, even voting if possible - basically I want a defederation action, but will take a user-level block if that is all I can get. People might be able to engender this behavior with keywords, but the key would be to allow things like a discussion of the [email protected] community name, while blocking the users from that instance name - and yet given the above issue of not being able to search for users at all, my guess is that keyword-based blocking would do the exact opposite of that? (cutting out posts that just happen to contain the instance name, while allowing the users free reign so long as their posts do not contain the instance name)
Either way, I do so look forward to the development of this fantastic Lemmy alternative, which nonetheless federates with it plus so much else besides!:-)
Uh oh, but you said that you would never say the words "not good"... /s :-P
But yeah, the wisdom of the ages seems to tell us that "what goes around comes around" and "whatever system you choose to use to measure others with, you will end up using the very same system of measurement against your very own self" - i.e. if you don't want others to be a certain way, like hypocritical, then don't be that way yourself. It probably has to do with formation of the superego portion of our personalities, but however it is implemented, it seems to be an accurate description of human psychology.
So if we say that others are "stupid"... then isn't that surely what we think that we do ourselves, at least sometimes? In contrast, if we allow ourselves to realize that others may not be "stupid" but merely "misled" or "mistaken in this particular area" or "in possession of incorrect facts with which to base conclusions upon" - all of these being very distinct from such thoughts as "they are most definitely dumb as a post" - then we see others more clearly, and also thereby are more accepting of our own very selves.
Which in turn allows us to see still other things (in the world, including both them and us) more clearly as well - i.e. instead of muddying the waters, we aim to see whatever is truly there. So it's not even something that we need to do for the sake of "kindness" (to either them or ourselves), so much as it is necessary for deeper logical introspection as well.
Anyway, to me these words seem to conjure a thought like "don't judge someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes". Or the political variation "surely the leopards who eat everyone's faces off would never eat my face off in particular!" The converse of either of these points to a weaker, lesser, lower, unclear form of thinking... that will ultimately wrap back around to hurt our very selves, despite how at first glance someone could think that they only intended to be negative against other people. But there is a better way, and that is to realize the truth of this principle: "what goes around comes around". So simple... yet missed by what seems like everyone that I've ever met (including, you guessed it, myself! ๐คฃ).