OpenStars

joined 10 months ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Uh oh, but you said that you would never say the words "not good"... /s :-P

But yeah, the wisdom of the ages seems to tell us that "what goes around comes around" and "whatever system you choose to use to measure others with, you will end up using the very same system of measurement against your very own self" - i.e. if you don't want others to be a certain way, like hypocritical, then don't be that way yourself. It probably has to do with formation of the superego portion of our personalities, but however it is implemented, it seems to be an accurate description of human psychology.

So if we say that others are "stupid"... then isn't that surely what we think that we do ourselves, at least sometimes? In contrast, if we allow ourselves to realize that others may not be "stupid" but merely "misled" or "mistaken in this particular area" or "in possession of incorrect facts with which to base conclusions upon" - all of these being very distinct from such thoughts as "they are most definitely dumb as a post" - then we see others more clearly, and also thereby are more accepting of our own very selves.

Which in turn allows us to see still other things (in the world, including both them and us) more clearly as well - i.e. instead of muddying the waters, we aim to see whatever is truly there. So it's not even something that we need to do for the sake of "kindness" (to either them or ourselves), so much as it is necessary for deeper logical introspection as well.

Anyway, to me these words seem to conjure a thought like "don't judge someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes". Or the political variation "surely the leopards who eat everyone's faces off would never eat my face off in particular!" The converse of either of these points to a weaker, lesser, lower, unclear form of thinking... that will ultimately wrap back around to hurt our very selves, despite how at first glance someone could think that they only intended to be negative against other people. But there is a better way, and that is to realize the truth of this principle: "what goes around comes around". So simple... yet missed by what seems like everyone that I've ever met (including, you guessed it, myself! ๐Ÿคฃ).

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Enemies should think twice before "pissing off" (hehe) someone who has access to a crapulence cannon!

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sometimes a critique can be most helpful, especially if delivered with kind intentions.

[โ€“] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh man how did I never hear of the great wide-open world of Star Trek pharts? :-P

img

- source

img2

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Definitely Reddit's buildup was smart. The transition to profitability not so much. Although we'll see.

Man, remember all those who kept arguing against it? I would say "Reddit is dying", and these new accounts that had never visited my sub before we decided it should go dark suddenly appeared and started talking crap about anyone who criticized Reddit. That should have been a smoking gun alone for people to realize what was going on. But instead, people just said "yup, that's Reddit for you". Which extremely unfortunately... they were right, bc that is what it had become by that time.

i.e., spez didn't kill Reddit by denying the usage of third-party apps - that was merely the final nail in the coffin for many of us, topping off a process that had begun several years earlier.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Nope. I mean yes, obviously, but first, we need another hour and a half long process to talk about it. Followed by another to talk about how we feel about the transformation afterwards.

I loved the Sword Art Online Netflix anime that did basically the opposite of that:-).

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Speak for yourself! I want it known that *I* for one, am *very* immature!:-P

Ah, that part "without rational grounds to do so" makes such a huge difference doesn't it? :-D

Like e.g.:

img

Ignoring all the genocide done by Russia, and China, and North Korea, but hyper-focusing on the not even direct but mere indirect aid to the actual genocide-doing people, and even then painting with an extremely broad brush and saying that nobody who thinks otherwise exists within the group on that "other side".

I disagree though that it is directed at "random" people. Hexbears yes (it's kinda their whole thing!:-P), perhaps Lemmygrad.ml too (whose content definitely appears on your instance) - though importantly, Lemmy.World (which this community is based in) defederates from both of those, and has ~80% of the monthly active users btw (thus the userbase "here" only partially but mostly may not be thought of to include those 2 instances, depending on how you look at it?) - and yes also that mod of Lemmy.ml who told the person to kill themselves seemed fairly random as well (yet all the more troublesome since lemmy.ml is federated by nearly every instance, the only exceptions being tiny single-admin ones). But the above image, note from the URL that it is from lemmy.ml, seems not entirely "random" to me - it is instead very much "directed", at a particular group. As that style of propaganda tends very much to be... not "random" at all!

Although conservative Alt-Right sources appeared on Reddit as well, so both sites have a hefty amount of "alternative fact" sources. Moderation efforts are a more limiting resource on Lemmy so it makes sense that there is more of it here, overall. So long as we allow the lure of communities such as [email protected] to sway us as we retain federation with those instances that not only allow but propagate that content, from the very site instance admins themselves, the situation will remain - the only recourse being for people to either leave their instances and go somewhere that allows defederation (either instance-wide such as the tiny lemmy.cafe or quokk.au; or switch to Mbin or PieFed that allows full content blocking of any instance that any user specifies, without needing admin approval). Edit: I forget to finish my sentence there: or else get an app that provides that functionality (I don't know which ones).

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Perhaps he is... (wait for it... wait for it... x20 with fillers placed in-between) building up to a mega-ultra instinct combo retort?

img

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This sounds familiar, almost as if history could perhaps, maybe, just possibly... repeat itself? Nah! (says spez)

People will follow the content creators indeed. Right now I'm not sure where they went though. The last I looked, it was basically nowhere, though to the extent that it was anything I thought it was X (even if via a temporary Mastodon intermediate). Musk fed Huffman bad info, which the Musk himself was not doing (or rather, the circumstances were entirely opposite - a public company going private rather than one attempting to make the polar opposition transition), and Huffman was dumb enough to fall for it, then Musk rakes in the rewards for his dirty deed.

Nowadays - or perhaps soon - as you said it might be Bluesky. So trading one corporate landlord for another, but it makes sense - the content creators will go wherever their audience is, and then the latter will in turn mindlessly follow the hoarde, but with an enormous delay measured in high number of months to even years. Plus, content creators need revenue to survive, e.g. how many videos is Ian Danskin (of Innuendo Studios) putting out these days? Then again, how many people especially younger ones even watch 20-30 minute long "video essays", rather than TikTok(-style) short-form clips?

All the rest: yup.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Here's a whole playlist from that same author that is amazing: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrttDbiWQ1XO1iHAszAsPobYSoR0uQg_1. The first one there will probably fuck you up though - it did me - as paradigm shattering is supposed to do, but hey, I did want to warn you in advance (to be absolutely clear: yes it is SOOO worth it!).

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

more mature and can actually discuss complex topics

I mean... well okay, more than Reddit yeah, for sure, in the sense that here at least it is possible at all.

Witch hunting is becoming a worse problem here than in Reddit.

How so? Genuinely I'm wondering lately if I'm causing issues. Generally that phrase presumes that the "witches" do not exist (I .. thought?), but e.g. tankies (literally: those who deny that the Tiananmen Square massacre ever took place, like with actual fatalities rather than being staged or some such) actually do exist. Anyway, I wonder if it's a natural reaction to the contentious atmosphere that has developed. Like all it takes is one person to walk into Chapotraphouse unawares, and bam, now you have radicalized someone against the bullies on the Fediverse.

Oh, or you might mean the overzealous modding of certain instances? Though I think that predates the Rexodus, so it's not "becoming a problem" so much as it was here long before most of us that are now here came over. e.g. here's a post from 3 years ago with a very familiar tone: https://lemmy.ml/post/206994. But I would argue that it is as true now as it was then: people don't enjoy being on the receiving end of intolerance, hence tend to be intolerant right back, and yet that is as it should be.

Anyway, the Fediverse has a lot more technical work to get done before it can be more palatable to most people, without HEAVY blocking - as that 3-year-old post shows, the issue isn't going away anytime soon, hence the friction between mutually opposing ideological constructs (e.g. "people in the USA should just die", vs... not that) is only going to spark more conflicts. We'd best settle in and get used to it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Not on Lemmy proper but both Mbin and PieFed have that already. e.g. visit https://piefed.social/, click 3 horizontal bars -> Topics.

 

PieFed looks so amazing! And it is fantastic how it continues to be developed more all the time.

Though it still lacks numerous features found on Lemmy - e.g. being able to search for users (I tried searching for one of my favorite people to talk to, lvxferre, and many variations such as @[email protected], but piefed.social came up with nothing - it seems to search only within the text fields, and I saw nothing in any of the dropdowns to look for a "user", or a "community", etc.). Likewise I tried to find existing posts in that search bar - e.g. https://lemmy.world/post/21055894 "Lemmy's gaining popularity, so I thought new people should see this." but again could not. Another one is that the frontend UI needs some polish, e.g. on this post I literally cannot see the name of the community (no matter how far I zoom out), only that it begins with "[META] Piefeโ€ฆ" (oh wait no, now I see, at https://ponder.cat/post/326806 - that's the name of the post? but then why is it repeated like that, in tiny font, right next to / above the huge font, and also cut off - wouldn't it make more sense to just stop the list at "[email protected]"? or if it is important enough to add, then not to cut it off?)

Minor issues of polish aside, the USA election season is coming up so... this makes me wonder: can you block users from a given list of instances using PieFed? e.g. if I wanted to block users, and I mean all of communities, posts, comments, even voting if possible - basically I want a defederation action, but will take a user-level block if that is all I can get. People might be able to engender this behavior with keywords, but the key would be to allow things like a discussion of the [email protected] community name, while blocking the users from that instance name - and yet given the above issue of not being able to search for users at all, my guess is that keyword-based blocking would do the exact opposite of that? (cutting out posts that just happen to contain the instance name, while allowing the users free reign so long as their posts do not contain the instance name)

Either way, I do so look forward to the development of this fantastic Lemmy alternative, which nonetheless federates with it plus so much else besides!:-)

 

He's funny ๐Ÿคฃ

 

Yay a new one, finally! ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

3
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I'm not sure why they chose the title that they did though.

 
3
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I don't know how to link to it directly, but I mean the #5 entry in this imgur dump (the preview pic is wrong, it's showing the #1 entry, but you'll know the right one bc of the guy holding the hoop). Some of the others aren't bad either, but definitely check out the hoop one, I'm saying.:-)

 

(The title you see below mine is the wording chosen by the OP of the full post - I hope I do not cause offense, but I cannot control it showing up here as it is linked.)

118
YSK (ecdn.teacherspayteachers.com)
 
129
Inspiration (www.planetofsuccess.com)
 
view more: next โ€บ