Are you implying that Trump believers with faith deep enough to buy the stock regularly (eg they're not an oligarch/enterprise doing it to bribe Trump) is thinking this logically?
People either vote for him for other reasons (tax cuts for the rich, conservatism, fear for the border or racism) or are deep enough into a cult to disregard anything.
Flying out of the window.
If you don't travel in Boeing you have no reason for existence. Your lack of support for Boeing shareholders is appalling. The company shareholder has sent an expert to perform corrective action. The expert is known for his competence due to solving other major problems like John Barnett.
Remember, we all should work for the best the quarterly return and please our masters.
Polish speaker here this is a moderately sensible sentence that reads:
The ruthless Grzegorz Brzęczyszczykiewicz (actual name and surname) has departed from Strzebrzeszyn (town name) to Pszczyna (another town) via Szymankowszczyzna (some village). Although many times he was full of bile, oblivious to the results, he found the final happiness in a grass blade.
The last sentence makes little logical sense to me, 'although' doesn't fit there. 'happiness in a grass blade' sounds like an idiom for a love of nature, but actually doesn't ring any bell. While 'final happiness' is ominous as fuck.
Just strap the blade missile to some missile. Shoot it with a bow or something.
Also a worker that doesn't have to waste time on bureaucracy and healthcare considerations has more time to be productive.
That makes sense. In my mind I saw this going against shortsword or lonsword.
To be honest it looks like something that will easier break itself due to structural weaknesses being a part of the design. If I didn't google it I would think it's some sort of medieval meme (named swordbreaker because it breaks).
Isn't that just a regular nuclear explosion in space? I don't think there's too much of development needed.
Last time I checked almost every major player just agreed we don't do that to not fuck up our future.
I program 2-3 layers above (Tensorflow) and those words reverberate all the way up.
Going one step deeper, at the source, it's oligarchy and companies owning the law and in consequence also its enforcement.
How about you address his logic instead of going full ad personum.
You likely see this as a ramblings because barely anyone thinks about confucianism in modern times.
But it was state enforced for a while in multiple countries and left it's mark in strict social hierarchies, blind subservience to one's parents and focus on collective and ignoring individual needs and problems. Those reverberate in modern times and make the countries what they are now.
"Abolish our criminal government" by supporting a known member of the establishment with a history of fraud and infidelity. I don't know what can go wrong.
But then again it's a two party system there. So they really don't have a way out and it might seem like the only one.