MostlyGibberish

Right. If you want to debate with people you have a rapport with, great. But if you're just being a contrarian and only talking about why you don't like something other people enjoy, they're gonna think you're a dick.

Spotify is the only service I actively use. I'm not big on music fidelity, so for my purposes, it provides value.

The Hulu and Disney+ bundle because my mom and girlfriend use it, and it's not worth convincing them to use my Jellyfin server.

Prime Video, just because I have Amazon prime, but I don't think I even have the app installed on any of my devices.

These days, if I'm watching something on my own, I don't even bother looking for it on streaming apps. I just legally acquire a Blu-ray copy and add it to Jellyfin.

Right, but he was (allegedly) killed by another rich, connected, corrupt person to stop him from taking anyone else down with him. Which adds another wrinkle to the whole thing. When you try to hold someone like that accountable, they kill you and get away with it.

I mean, that goes both ways. As an American, and especially as a guy, I often get sideways looks when I mention I have a bidet. If you can't or won't try it out, fine, but people are really acting like it's strange to clean yourself off using water.

One of the things I like about containers is how central the IaC methodology is. There are certainly tools to codify VMs, but with Docker, right out of the gate, you'll be defining your containers through a Dockerfile, or docker-compose.yml, or whatever other orchestration platform. With a VM, I'm always tempted to just make on the fly config changes directly on the box, since it's so heavy to rebuild them, but with containers, I'm more driven to properly update the container definition and then rebuild the container. Because of that, you have an inherent backup that you can easily push to a remote git server or something similar. Maybe that's not as much of a benefit if you have a good system already, but containers make it easier imo.

I've always been hesitant to host any services on a device with a non-removable battery. Having a battery constantly charging and discharging isn't great for it and could potentially be a fire hazard. I know modern devices have gotten much smarter about how they charge, so maybe it's not as much of an issue anymore, but still something to be aware of depending on how old your phone is or how you modify the firmware.

Personally, with how cheap you can find a mini PC or SBC, I would just save up a bit (maybe even sell the device you're planning to host on) and keep an eye out for deals. You're going to get a lot more freedom and power with those devices, and not have to try to hack around the limitations of a mobile OS.

My advice for security is don't expose anything to the Internet unless you're sure you know how to secure it. If you want to be able to access self-hosted services remotely, setting up a VPN is the way to go. OpenVPN is gonna be the most widely supported way of doing that. In fact, based on a quick Google search, it looks like your router has an OpenVPN server built in. If you're willing to put in some effort for something more modern and performant, look into WireGuard.

Another benefit of having a VPN is that if you set it up to allow access back out to the Internet, you can use it to mask your internet traffic while you're connected to an untrusted network.

I can't wait for Lemmy to catch up with Mastodon in this regard. Between this and not being able to easily migrate your account to a new instance, it doesn't feel like Lemmy users have as much of the freedom that the fediverse can provide.

SFTP is pretty simple to work with via shell commands. Your best bet is probably just to write a script to archive/compress your configuration and upload it, and then set that script to run periodically. You can do this within HA.

https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/shell_command/

That sounds interesting. Thanks for the recommendation!

It's rough in the US. Most iPhone users will insist that iMessage is better and refuse to use anything else, and then whine when an android user is in a group chat and none of the features work.

Part of me is starting to wonder, honestly. I will say that the web UI for TrueNAS Scale is leagues better than Unraid's, which to me always felt confusing and hacked together. ZFS is also really nice, although Unraid did recently add support.

One pain point I've run into with TNS is that access to Docker or Kubernetes seems to be intentionally locked down from access anywhere but the built in apps catalog. As someone who works with Docker and various orchestration engines professionally, I much prefer being able to define and stand up my own services to using a list of predefined templates. There are obviously ways of getting around the restrictions in TNS, but with Unraid, I could install something like Portainer or simply drop into the terminal and run docker commands myself. Not having that is frustrating.

Overall though, I think TrueNAS is a much cleaner and more modern user experience, so long as you stay on their rails. Which I suppose is the point.