MentalGymnastics

joined 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Your the one all worked up calling people corporate bootlickers. Pretend all you want that you don't live in a world where you don't support corporations to enjoy music. Pretend all you want that your not doing the same exact shit your complaining about. Your sucking off some rich dude just to for whatever reason avoid giving money to a corporation and instead give it straight to rich dudes pocket. Weirdo is acting like he doesn't listen to his shitty music on YouTube music or Apple or whatever corpo platform. Keep pretending you would even know half the artists you do without corporations allowing them to advertise it on an app you use on your cellphone.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm just saying there can be a case made in front of a judge about the government funding these companies and then using these companies to reprive people of their 1st amendment rights as they have been proven to have done on X.

But whatever you say... Coal miners.... Unemployment.... Between jobs.... Slavery... Wtf are you talking about?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There has indeed been curtailing of 1st amendment rights. We all remember the twitter files I'm sure. You can bet anything that same crap happens on meta platforms. Surely there is an argument to be made on the curtailing of 1st amendment rights and whether these social media companies are an apparatus of the gov.

But yea according to all these expert lawyers in the comments nothing to see here.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

They sure have received a lot of government/taxpayer money for being such a private anti free speech company.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

The fact meta has received 2 billion dollars in taxpayer gov't money should entitle every single taxpayer to their 1st amendment.

view more: next ›