Mee

joined 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Remainder: New York Times is an american company.

 

Hidden records reveal a widespread pattern of lax enforcement of laws and regulations intended to protect the environment and communities

 

French Prime Minister François Bayrou has strongly condemned US President Donald Trump’s harsh treatment of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office, describing it as a shocking display of "brutality" designed to humiliate Zelensky and coerce him into acquiescing to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s demands.

 

Russian authorities have subjected Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) and civilian captives to torture, prolonged incommunicado detention, enforced disappearance and other inhumane treatment, which amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity, Amnesty International said in a new report today.

The report, A Deafening Silence: Ukrainians held incommunicado, forcibly disappeared and tortured in Russian captivity, documents how Ukrainian POWs and civilians held captive by Russia since February 2022 are being deliberately cut off from the outside world, often for years. A lack of transparency over their whereabouts has allowed for their torture and other ill-treatment in detention, and even unlawful killings of POWs, to continue with total impunity.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

As I said before, I did not get anything from doing good and I only lost by doing it.

Evil society exists, if the good has to be done, then why should I be the one to do it?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I spent my current age doing good and that earned me zero returns and some losses and I know a lot of people who had a similar experience to me.

No one even feels greatful for the good I do.

Respectfully your argument does not hold up for me.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

What guarantee that if they were in my own shoes they wouldn't fuck me up?

Why not focus on my benefit regardless of its effect on the world?

Why care about a society that does not care about me?

I feel that The Platform movie answer exactly this question, everyone care only about himself.

 

Considering the fact the doing good will not earn you anything in anyway and that if you are not a millionaire or billionaire your good acts won't matter at all.

What's the point?

I had seen with my own eyes good people being manipulated and fucked because they did something good, on the other hand it's pretty rare for evil people to face any consequences.

Why should I restrict my free hands with ethics and why should I think about it?

Just a note: I am a deist, so I don't believe that doing good will get you anything in the after life.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Reminder: Russia violated all of these uninformed.

Also, why is this posted here? This is not a meme.

 

Operation Lone Star has unleashed a windfall for private contractors cashing in on a four-year-long emergency shopping spree.

 

In short:

More than half of Australian companies have improved their gender pay gap, compared to last year. But for every $1 a man earns, women, on average, still only earn 78 cents.

The gender pay gap is not about "equal pay for equal work", but aims to quantify the difference between the average earnings of women and men in the workforce.

What's next?

Anyone can view the gender pay gaps at companies that employ more than 5 million Australian workers, and their plans to reduce the gap.

 

From airlines to banks, fixing Canada’s competition problem starts with smarter domestic reforms.

 
 

The chancellor of the University of Helsinki told a newspaper last month that US authorities had pressured the university to remove certain terms from its press release about Fulbright scholarships.

 

Iranian Vice President for Strategic Affairs Mohammad Javad Zarif has stepped down on the "advice" of the country's judiciary chief, Gholam Hossein Mohseni-Ejei.

 

Experts expect Trump’s team to lean on legal arguments, not science, to take down EPA’s 16-year-old endangerment finding.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (5 children)

What will that achieve here exactly?

view more: next ›