I've read it. Seems ok/reasonable to me. Let's see what others think. Thanks for the effort and for make it publicly accesible.
MalditoBarbudo
You got me good :(
Looks good, thanks for the effort!
If you are on gnome,.gnome logs do most of the things you want (if I recall correctly, some years since I run gnome)
I wouldn't call "professional cheaters" to the students that carefully proofread the output. People using chatgpt and proofreading content and bibliography later are using it as a tool, like any other (Wikipedia, related papers...), so they are not cheating. This hack is intended for the real cheaters, the ones that feed chatgpt with the assignment and return whatever hallucination it gives to you without checking anything else.
Wow, my physics teacher was right!! You really can assume a chicken is a perfect sphere!! Now is easier to calculate volume assuming pi is 5.78.
"penas", that in Spanish (my native language) means sorrows. I think it fits perfectly
As a former postdoc converted to technician, I endorse this message
But tidy or not, Data is always pipe able
There is a professional ski athlete, Canadian I think, called Nullmeyer, I always think of "little bobby tables" when I see her, but seems like ski tv and databases were made by people that sanitize the inputs
Cats. If you don't believe me, ask Australians. Cats all the way.