KerryAnnCoder

Oh, cool, didn't know there was a New Zealand based card game!

To be fair, those are British-style baked beans.

I was born and raised in the US (and have returned there) but spent the last 4 years living in London, and British beans in tomato sauce are very different from American baked beans in BBQ sauce. Both have their charms, but British beans are basically a breakfast food as main, American beans are a BBQ side-dish. Beans on Toast is a wonderful British breakfast, but Americans haven't heard of it, and those who have might turn their nose up at it.

Very different cultures, and so much we can learn about multiculturalism for one can of baked beans - no, one picture of a can of baked beans.

So, yeah, I think it deserves and upvote.

Maybe I'm not understanding it correctly, but Monads are data-structure objects whose methods return an data-structure object of the same type.

Like, (using Typescript):

interface IdentityMonad<T> {
  map: ((fn: (v: T)) => T) => IdentityMonad<T>;
  value: T
}

const Identity = <T>(value: T) => {
  const map = (fn) => Identity(fn(initialValue));
  return {
    map, value
  }
}

const square = (x) => x * x;

const twoId = Identity<number>(2);
console.log(twoId.value) //=> 2;
const sixtyFourId = twoId.map(square).map(square).map(square).map(square).map(square);
console.log(sixtyFourId.value) // => 64;

I don't think that the cancellation of Prodigy has anything to do with systemic mysogyny, (though I can see how it can look that way).

First off, a Star Trek aimed at kids was a hard sell. Sure, it might have made sense to Paramount, seeing all the Jar Jar Binks toys that got sold, but Star Trek has always been at it's best when it's aimed at hard questions that society is dealing with right now. If it's an ethical dilemma that an 8 year old can figure out, it's not exactly an ethical dilemma. It was experiment that was tried and didn't work; unlike Lower Decks which is an experiment that tried and did work.

Secondly: TNG literally re-launched the franchise from a 3 year 1960s sci-fi serial that managed to get 5 movies (two of them good at the time), to an entire franchise, from which Deep Space Nine, Voyager, and all the rest were launched. Of COURSE Picard was more important to the franchise than Janeway.

But mostly, Voyager wasn't very good.

That's really what it comes down to. People saw Picard, rightly or wrongly, as the continuation of a character and a story that they absolutely loved - TNG. Who wouldn't have wanted another season of TNG (which we kind of got in Picard Series 3)? Now, honestly - look me in the eye and say: Do you really want another season of Voyager? Especially near the end when they were really running out of ideas?

There might have been a nostalgic draw to having Mulgrew come back as a holographic version of Janeway, but that's about it - in all honestly, the inclusion of Janeway turned me off from wanting to check Prodigy out, because I did not like Voyager.

There's also one last counter to the "This is systemic misogyny" argument and that is - Star Trek doesn't seem like a franchise to be unaware of systemic misogyny and, if anything, works to combat it. Yes, there were a lot of problems in the Brannon/Braga era (I got turned off of Enterprise with the obvious fanservice in the first episode, and what's up with Troi's first/second season uniform?), but by and large, if there ever was a franchise that took a hard look at prejudices and systemic problems, that'd be Star Trek. The joke, of course, is "When did Star Trek get so woke?"- the answer is 1966!

So - I get how taken in a vacuum, this can seem like systemic misogyny. And maybe it even is, I just don't think the preponderance of evidence supports the theory, and I don't think it fits Occam's razor.

Honestly, I kind of hate it, but since Reddit is unusable, considering all the subs that have gone dark (presumably permanently).

I'll be honest. I don't like the Fediverse concept - the fatal flaw of decentralized systems is that sometimes centralized systems are great. Basically, reddit was ONE BBS style forum for everything, which was the killer convenience. Similarly Twitter was the ONE microblogging platform for everybody, which was the killer convenience.

Because the moment anybody can operate a service, everyone does.

Right now, I need to buy a car, I can't find a good Lemmy community to get advice from. Searching for 'cars' in all federated communities returns:

Fuck [email protected] - 3.41K subscribers
[email protected] - 104 subscribers
Fuck [email protected] - 56 subscribers
Self Driving Cars - 19 subscribers
[email protected] - 11 subscribers
Electric [email protected] - 4 subscribers
RC [email protected] - 4 subscribers
[email protected] - 3 subscribers
Fuck [email protected] - 2 subscribers
[email protected] - 1 subscriber

Leave aside for a moment that "Fuck Cars" has 34x more subscribers than the biggest Cars community - there are two different "Fuck Cars" communities, and three different "Cars" communities. It's great that you have subscriber numbers, but there's no definitive place to find out information on cars. Reddit's CEO is right that Reddit was organized like a landed-gentry where a first-come-first-serve approach to the most popular forums was done, but that landed-gentry system solved this problem, whatever new problems it may have introduced.

Now, you could look for a technological solution to solve this problem: For example, you could have a centralized server for all federated Lemmies, some sort of "lemmyhub.com"

We'd all have to agree on it. People could set up alternatives, but we'd all have to basically coalesce and say: Yes, this is the thing we want. Maybe it'd use blockchain, I don't know. Point is, it's centralized and easy to find information. It would work "just like Reddit" where you would have ONE authentication/authorization that works seamlessly across all instances (the current system is anything but seamless), and there would be ONE key/value combo for keyword. So, instead of going to [email protected] & [email protected] & Cars & lemmy.world, you just go to cars.lemmyhub.com.

If you want to post, you just use your lemmyhub account and your post appears on the "default" community. You can still post on individual lemmies by going to the individual lemmy page as well, or by specifying which of your Lemmy instance accounts you want to post as.

Here's the problem with the merging all the cars communities together, though: There is nothing to prevent someone from creating [email protected] and spamming the community with bile or trolling. Lemmyhub could operate a blocklist for troll and hate communities and instances, but once you're doing that, you're making editorial decisions. And forget all the nasty ethics problems around "what's free speech/what's hate speech?" "what's acceptable to view/what's not?", you have legal liability problems if anything slips through the cracks.

Reddit wasn't perfect, and certainly they could have been more proactive with shutting down hate speech, and more speedy with shutting down illegal content, but by and large reddit worked. Reddit's authoritarian approach worked because it was mostly benevolent -- right up until the point that it wasn't.

So I don't think Lemmy can technologically make it's way out of the situation.

I think what needs to happen is a solution like the Wikipedia foundation; we establish a non-profit designed to create a centralized server which may choose or not choose to incorporate Lemmy instances. It runs on donations, not advertising, and it's not designed to maximize profit, only to keep the servers running. It would borrow heavily from the Wikipedia model in organization and structure.

Because I'll be honest - Lemmy and Mastodon are okay, but there's really nothing in them improving on the old Newsgroups system of the late 80s and 1990s. Reddit captured the market for forum discussions because it was simply a better solution, there's nothing in Lemmy that makes it better - for the user - than Reddit.

Should we then abandon Lemmy and go back to Reddit? No, of course not. Reddit, if anything shows us that eventually all authoritarian systems, no matter how benevolent they start, always eventually turn tyrannical, and can do so on a whim, and once they do so, it is impossible to get back to benevolence.

But I've been a redditor for 15 years - I predated subreddits, if you can believe that. And I'm not finding the things I used to go to Reddit for here on Lemmy - information, expert and informed discussion, and niche topics. Maybe that's an adoption problem that will be solved with scale (and I hope it is), but right now, I feel like my luxury Bently sedan got totaled and I'm driving a 20 year old Honda Civic with manual transmission. By all means I'm grateful for the tent, but I still miss my Bentley

“These people who are mad, they’re mad because they used to get something for free, and now it’s going to be not free” -- Steve Huffman, [https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/15/23762868/reddit-ceo-steve-huffman-interview](Source: The Verge)

Let's be frank: Reddit absolutely has the right to charge for their API. But the consequences of them charging for the API is that moderators are choosing to no longer use the platform. And they will have to ask themselves whether they will make more money from charging for the API than they will lose from people not using the product.

Here's a good metaphor:

Imagine a convention center [Reddit] with an infinite number of conference rooms for conventions. There are big rooms for big conventions (r/aww) small rooms for small conventions (r/poker) and very small rooms for very small conventions (r/LeonardNimoyIsSecretlyBansky).

The convention center had this business plan: They would let anyone set up a convention at their convention center, for free. Because it's free, lots of people would hold conventions there, and they could sell advertising on the walls and in the rooms. Heck, it was even a great idea, as companies could target specific conventions that they wanted to advertise to.

Now, the thing about this plan was that it was such a good idea that it quickly ran into some problems. Convention organizers [mods] had problems with people coming into their conventions to try to sabotage it, make trouble, provoke people. Additionally, the convention center itself was okay, but didn't have a lot of access for the disabled.

The convention center, however, gave the organizers a set of tools [the API] which they could use to provide security, management, etc. They weren't perfect, and left a lot to be desired, but by using those tools, the organizers could keep their conventions more or less chugging along without it turning into a full-time job. (Though maybe it was still a part-time job!) They could build out ramps for wheelchairs, braille stations for the blind, and improve the user experience: maps so that people wouldn't get lost, summaries for late developers, reminders for important events, etc.

Now, not everyone used those tools for selfless reasons. A few big companies [Microsoft/OpenGPT & other AI companies] used those tools that made the convention center easy to access, and they went around and learned a lot about the conventioneers and they used that information to make money.

Cut to today, and the convention center isn't making as much money as they hoped they would. They want to find another source of revenue since advertising isn't enough.

So they said: Hey, we give away the tools that big companies use to make money. We should charge those big companies to use those tools, or we can take them away.

And what they did was charge everybody who had been relying on those tools. Not just the big companies (who I don't think anyone would mind if they paid a fee) but also the convention organizers and the people who made handicapped ramps. And they charged them all the same rate.

Well, since the convention organizers can no longer organize their conventions without those tools, and they can't afford the price that the convention center was charging for the tools, then they did what was reasonable: they shut down their conventions [the blackout].

Which presents a problem for Reddit, because if there are less convention organizers, there are less conventions, which means less convention goers, which means that they sell less advertising on the walls.

Up until this point, this is simply a miscalculation on the part of the convention center. The convention center has options - they could say: "You need to run a convention to get the tools for free, and only then you can use it on YOUR convention." Or: "Everyone can use the tools for free - enough to organize a convention or two, but if you use it a whole lot, like you're a big company gathering conventoneer data, you have to pay for it."

There were ways to make this work out okay.

But instead, what the convention center decided to do was stick with the original idea to charge for the tools at the original price. When they did that, they decreased the value of the convention center, because now, not everyone could operate a convention there.

This is just business. When price goes up, demand goes down. And maybe some bean counter at the convention center figures they can make more profit by charging more for the API than the revenue they lose from advertising.

But it's extremely callous, and downright idiotic in any industry to demand that people buy and continue to use your product at the price you set, when they don't want to.

Full stop.

Comic Sans is actually really good for dyslexic people. It's why I usually use Comic Sans or Comic Neue when I print stuff out for my dad.

Isn't that what Rust is?

I've had good luck running Lasers & Feelings type games, created by the same team that did Blades in the Dark - and it's perfect for new players who don't want to get bogged down in miniatures rules and combat tactics.