JeremyHuntQW12

joined 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 minute ago
  1. Uploading ID to site.

  2. face scanning and continual monitoring, so if a person comes into view they must face scan. Under the law, its prohibited for children to watch prohibited sites even with their parents.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 minutes ago

4chan is not excluded.

The Communication minister can extend the requirement to any internet site at any time without parliamentary approval.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 minutes ago

Read it again.

What it actually says is that SM sites can collect personal ID, but must provide an alternative.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

Well what are you supposed to click on, the whole traffic light or just the lights, all the blocks with a cyclist, or just the cycle, or just the blocks that are all cycle ? I've tried everything and nothing works.

The sad part is that these don’t really stop bots, captcha solver services have bot accessible APIs which can be used to solve these things for malicious actors, they pay real people pennies to solve them and sell it as a service.

Its not really intended for that, it for bots that run thousands of clicks a minute to bring the site up in a search algorithm.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 25 minutes ago

Identification would need to be handled by a 3rd party to even remotely work. Then they pass on the “yes they’re over 16” tick to the social media platform, with no actual identity details.

The legislatiion specifically allows SM sites to handle ID.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 26 minutes ago

I don’t see many options between asking for a birthdate and asking for ID for this problem. I don’t see any way that this can be enforced that isn’t problematic.

The senate inquiry outlined the two likely solutions :

  1. Uploading ID to the website.

  2. 3D face scanning. This will include continual monitoring so if another person comes into view they will have to face scan in. Remember, its prohibited for chidren to even watch prohibited content with their parents.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 29 minutes ago (1 children)

The law does not require users to upload government IDs as part of the verification process.

No, it merely requires the sites to provide an alternative, such as face scanning using a mobile phone unlock. Using a computer ? Then you'll have hand over your ID.

The law also explicitly gives sites the right to onsell private information if its outlined in the terms of agrrement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I think it was Airport (not Airport 707). It was a Rank film.

I love how spoofing it meant 95% of the dialog and story was the same. What a classic.

Actually they changed the plot to make it less silly.

In the original, the WW2 pilot is on the ground and is lowered into the 707 from a helicopter through the front window. This is briefly referenced in Flying High when they lower the window like in the original.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The screen was only in that position or closed. There was no friction joint. You could only view the screen if you were standing up !

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I always boil one egg or three because I'm embarassed to boil two.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

The Camry is imported from Japan. And the Rav4 from Canada.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

"Airplane" is called "Flying High" in Australia because the film it spoofed was an Australian film.

view more: next ›