JackGreenEarth

What is a Matrioshka brain if not a giant computer in space?

Kant didn't support Utilitarianism, he was in favour of categorical imperatives that were always true.

Tbf, everyone else is allowed to use generative AI too. It isn't one rule for them and one rule for everyone else, it's just the courts deemed AI models transformative - which I agree with. I just also think they should abolish, or at least, significantly weaken, copyright in general.

Who wouldn't be? The children are healthy and he only edited their genes to try and cure genetic diseases. That is an admirable goal, not something that should be illegal.

Why would a system without exploitation be worse rather than better? Can you give an example from the real world, or is this hypothetical?

Once it's ready enough, I'd be happy to! At the moment it's still in development.

But the main thing is previous and current exploitative systems, it was at least in part necessary because you needed humans to do labour. If robots will happily do it all for us, I fail to see what the would be leaders would have to control the rest of the people with, and stopping them just using the robots to produce what they need, self sufficient ly

If AI and robots are doing all the work, literally all of it, then our whole society falls apart and corporations are meaningless, since money is meaningless if robots can create stuff for us for free. If we don't need to work, we can't buy stuff from them, so a socialist society would necessarily emerge, which would be good.

I'm actually (very slowly) developing a FOSS AR platform myself that runs on a website with any decent phone. FOSS AR is the only AR I'd want to use.

Assistance, if they voluntarily choose to censor their own feed, is quite different from censoring it without the consent of the child.

How is it uplifting? This is a game, it would be uplifting if it was in real life