Filling fees for an arbitrator may be higher than filing a case in court.
Which is why Valve is making the change. They were potentially paying a lot for these filings.
Goronmon
joined 1 year ago
Steam is actually pretty decent, by company standards.
They aren't doing this because they are decent. It's because they were getting reamed on fees through people choosing the arbitration. I believe it was a law firm basically encouraging people to request arbitration because they would get paid every time a claim was submitted, regardless of the outcome.
Hard for me not to get excited about a new Monster Hunter.
Still have Rise/Sunbreak sitting on my backlog barely played, but I still hope this one turns out well.
Yeah, I get not wanting to get too hyped about games ahead of time, but it feels like these days people are online to look for the next game to get angry about.
Also most quests are just “talk to npc, use Batman Vision to follow a trail, kill enemy, return”
This applies to a lot of games, even Witcher 3.
Good luck figuring out how to avoid labeling every game ever made as a "skinner box". It's basically a jaded person's definition of what video games are at their core.
If you value your time, you wouldn't be playing video games at all. As they are nearly an entertaining way to waste time.
All games waste either time, money, or both. So I guess we just have to make video games illegal now. Oh well. Was fun while it lasted.
Without being a gacha game, World of WarCraft is guilty of a lot of the same stuff.
I'm not a fan of trying to poison the well on this discussion by trying to bring in a lot of secondary issues and try to broaden the issue to the point of uselessness.
The biggest issue with gambling is the ability to lose your money.
Sure, you can waste time with World of Warcraft. But I can also waste time playing too much Baldur's Gate 3, or Civilization, or by binging shows on Netflix.
But none of those allow me to spend thousands or tens of thousands by gambling on mechanics within the media itself.
How about we focus on that issue first?
But both are gambling.
Nah, they are not comparable in a meaningful way. Sure, at a high level, you can apply aspects of "gambling" to both examples. But the biggest and most important point is the ability to spend actual money for additional changes at "winning".
People are against gaming because of some deep-seating fear of Random Number Generation by itself. They are against it because of how easy it is to lose money.
Isn't that foam what we are discovered is leeching into ground-water supplies everywhere and is super unhealthy for everyone?
I meant more that a restaurant owner isn't going to see or really get any value from an open source solution vs closed source specifically. They are just choosing a platform at a price point that works for them.
273
92
Legendary dev behind Devil May Cry and Dragon’s Dogma is leaving Capcom after 30 years
(www.destructoid.com)
view more: next ›
No Man's Sky was much more lacking at release compared to how they sold the game. And they basically went radio silent for quite a long time.
I don't see how the two situations are similar.
And No Man's Sky isn't that much better now anyways.