GodOfThunder

That's why he has more subscribers that the CNBC and other popular mainstream propaganda outlets, because he's untrustworthy /s 🤡

Let's focus on the substance of the information being presented rather than the person presenting it.

Sure they are so well funded /s. At least they are able to speak their mind without getting banned.

Noted. You can go back to watching your favorite mainstream propaganda outlet.

Youtube bans North Korean vloggers, so much for "free speech".

So they blocked a channel of harmless snack-eating videos because the uploader is in NK? What am I missing?

He says something about the invincible comic having a white woman who was illustrated as a woman of color in the show and that people call that "woke".

The way they've simplified the game for the neurons, it still has a long way to go.

I tried in [email protected] but the bot doesn't work because of a protection set on /signup and /login pages.

Customizable feed algorithms: One of the best things about Lemmy is that users can choose their own algorithm for their home feed. My ideal platform would take this a step further by allowing users to customize their feed algorithms like in Bluesky.

Bluesky, a decentralized social media platform, has introduced a feature called "custom feeds" that allows users to choose their own algorithms[1][2][3]. This feature gives users the ability to subscribe to different algorithms or create their own algorithms for others to follow[1]. The goal is to provide users with more control over their social media experience and address concerns about algorithmic manipulation[1][2][3].

Currently, creating a custom feed on Bluesky requires some technical knowledge, but the platform plans to make it easier for users to create custom feeds in the future[1]. The ability to choose different algorithms for feeds gives users more ownership and control over the content they see[2]. This feature is seen as a defining aspect of Bluesky and aligns with its decentralized approach[2].

Bluesky's vision is to replace the traditional "master algorithm" controlled by a single company with an open and diverse "marketplace of algorithms"[3][4]. The platform aims to enable the developer community to bring new algorithms to users quickly and effortlessly[4]. By embracing third-party development and customizable feed generation, Bluesky seeks to empower users and provide transparency and control over algorithmic choices[4].

The custom feeds feature is available in the latest version of Bluesky's mobile apps and web client, but the platform is currently invite-only[3]. Users can try this feature if they already have an account or receive an invite code[3].

Overall, Bluesky's custom feeds with user-customizable algorithms offer a unique approach to social media and aim to give users more control and transparency in their online experiences[1][2][3][4].

Citations: [1] https://www.engadget.com/bluesky-now-lets-you-choose-your-own-algorithm-183824105.html [2] https://www.wired.com/story/bluesky-my-feeds-custom-algorithms/ [3] https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/26/23739174/bluesky-custom-feeds-algorithms-twitter-alternative [4] https://blueskyweb.xyz/blog/3-30-2023-algorithmic-choice [5] https://techcrunch.com/2023/07/28/as-threads-soars-twitter-rival-bluesky-adopts-a-new-personalized-algorithmic-feed/ [6] https://9to5mac.com/2023/05/26/bluesky-feeds-custom-algorithms/

I can confirm that the Opera method works. I couldn't create an account before but I've managed to create the account using the built-in VPN of the Opera browser. Here's an example of a Python script written with Claude 2 that GPT-4 wouldn't have enough context for, https://lemm.ee/post/2595655 Really impressive.

Oh yeah I was thinking more along the lines of video games or movies where there are too many people creating it. For books, etc you can definitely donate.

There should be a way to pay only the workers when you buy something. In that case, you could pay them but only after pirating and making sure you enjoy it. Since there is nothing like that, I think you should pay only content from small creators. Big creators already have plenty, and paying for anything else just gives money to greedy executives who then lower the quality of the content to make more money. Of course, if you have the means and don't pay anything, you are just making sure there will be less of that content made in the future. It isn't scalable; if everybody pirated content without paying a single cent, there would be no content made except by hobbyists who don't want to make a living out of it.

I really like to see communities like lemmy.film, mtgzone.com, and programming.dev and wish there was an instance about literature.