They discuss the trends,
You need to be more specific. Can you copy and paste one?
They discuss the trends,
You need to be more specific. Can you copy and paste one?
What predictions? They're making predictions about the next year... in 1999, and not many specific ones either, just saying prospects are bleak. I don't see any predictions about the 2020s.
In fact, German GDP has nearly tripled since this was written. The only months of no growth were during 2008 and COVID and Germany outperformed all its neighbors. They didn't predict any of the conditions for either of those crises.
This article is from 1999. So just 24 years too late.
"US provocation" just means "sovereign countries signing treaties Russia doesn't want them to sign."
Yes, but HIMAR is pronounced like "high-mar". So they don't sound the same. And they only look the same if you choose to write ح as "h" instead of "7" or some other letter that conveys that sound accurately.
Jesus Christ make it stop.
"Should've" and "should of" are pronounced the same, what are you talking about? There's no way you can mix them up in speech. Are you even a native English speaker?
I miss it. There's just not enough people here. Refreshing doesn't bring hardly anything new, none of my favorite communities exist, and where they do they're so small that nothing gets posted for an entire day.
I mean, I know these things take time but I'm pessimistic.
j'éspère que la communauté migre ici sans difficulté.
Je l'espère aussi mais on en parlait pas beaucoup avant de boycotter.
It’s absolutely insane that we have a former President showing off some of the most classified information just for clout.
The fact that he was caught doing it so casually to someone for no benefit without a second thought indicates to me that he definitely profited off of it too.
Literally none of those things are predictions for the 2020s. Those are just issues from 24 years ago with suggested (neoliberal) solutions.
Germany largely addressed those concerns as you can see from the huge uptick in economic activity starting in 2000. The article did not predict the 2008 crisis, it did not predict the crisis with Russian gas, and so I'm having a hard time understanding why you're trying to slip this by people outside of a history community and acting like it's relevant.