I agree with the sentiment, but I always worry about the extreme 100 years from now
I could definitely see a corrupt government using that legislation to eliminate any news agencies that speak against them
I agree with the sentiment, but I always worry about the extreme 100 years from now
I could definitely see a corrupt government using that legislation to eliminate any news agencies that speak against them
I feel comfortable answering that last question!
No
I worry that phrase is a little too generic. If it were bannable, I could see kayakers getting in trouble
"Off for a day trip! Gonna float all the way from the river to the sea today!"
I missed out on the marketing for this. Was it supposed to be AAAA like Skull and Bones?
Thank you. I feel a lot better knowing it's just morons like you downvoting me. To be honest, I had no idea a stereotype like you actually existed
I feel so bad for you that I actually feel better about myself!
Thank you again. I'm not sure I would have ever made that connection if not for you
I think lurking is probably best for me
That really does help. Thank you
I didn't mean to be presumptive or interrogative. I meant to just include a second part if (and only if) it was relevant. I see now how it can easily come across that way
Would you be able to further explain the implication you mentioned? I don't understand how you got there. I don't mean to say you're wrong or anything. I just don't get the connection
That was really presumptive. I don't think they were endorsing Elon at all
I had a Brazilian professor. He was super smart, so maybe 3?
How would it work if it's not that large, though? They could only sell sunlight to people who are within the target radius, but that would be very temporary