Bisexual_Cookie

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

in the the wikipedia article it seems to use multiple kernels (either a rtos type kernel for iot and wearable devices or the linux kernel + aosp layer for phones, tablets, etc...) seems that in the new next version they will no longer use the linux kernel but their own kernel instead and move away from android entirely (i got that last bit from this article)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Yeah, seems their registrar took down the domain.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The granularity and scale of active directory is a major thing that is keeping linux out of offices, etc...I know you can do a lot with certain tools but nothing comes close as far as I have seen.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

2024 will be the year of the linux desktop

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Is it actually any good? I've seen some benchmarks that were not very promising but perhaps that'll change in the future ig.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Windows kept getting in the way of my productivity (I constantly needed to find workarounds for problems that didn't exist or were much easier to solve on linux, and I couldn't customize the ui to my liking) + it lacked basic things like a tabbed file-manager (before win11) and my hardware was getting slower so I jumped ship.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago

It can be, most information on wikipedia is good enough for most things. Political issues are sadly more sensitive to influence or bias, especially on a public (mainly english) encyclopedia like wikipedia.

The way citations are picked and presented can have bias, the selection of sources used for wikipedia articles can have bias, and the sources themselves can have bias...

-> Wikipedia is indeed an easy way to find a lot of primary and secondary sources, but that does not mean that these sources are always good or credible.

In context of the above, using wikipedia as a valid base for your political beliefs is, in my opinion, a bit problematic. (not saying that you do that btw, just that it is)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I don't think you understand what a primary source is... https://apus.libanswers.com/faq/2299 => Wikipedia is (like all encyclopedias) a tertiary source

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably less than 15min walking.

About 4 years ago a bunch of cows wandered straight into my parent's backyard... I woke up from wierd noises, looked outside and saw a huge fucking cow standing right outside the window staring at me. In a semi panic I went upstairs to wake my sister (was night at the time) and we were both just stupidly looking at them from the balcony while they were chilling down in the garden. They left whole lot of shit piles too!

view more: next ›