AdlachGyfiawn

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Can't hurt to try. And if it doesn't work, try, try again.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

"also, ozone is delicious yum yum yum"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Well hang on, let's hear it out

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

In what font does that say "pas"?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

... you're posting in the USA community

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Fingers crossed!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Fair enough: it was wrong of me to use 'citing Furr' as a per se negative thing. The rest, I think, stands.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I haven't read any of his books, though I have read everything he's posted online (that I'm aware of). My issue isn't necessarily with his methodology so much as his motivated reasoning—though you're completely right that liberal historians don't do any better, so maybe I should be more charitable.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

I usually like ProleWiki but I'm not sure I can get behind this article. They leave out that Soviet calibers were found in the bodies, don't mention the testimony of Dmitry Tokarev, and cite Grover Furr, who is a meme for obvious reasons. It comes off as grasping at straws.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

The documentary Stargate already answered this question

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Extremely rich coming from a British person. Not that they're wrong.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago

I find it deeply funny that you're using the Marxist conception of the stages of history while pretending not to know what Marxism is

view more: ‹ prev next ›