this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
84 points (100.0% liked)

News

22890 readers
3691 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Federal Aviation Administration said the Bombardier Challenger 600 jet had five people were aboard when the crash happened around 3:15 p.m. Friday near Naples, just north of where the interstate heads east toward Fort Lauderdale along what is known as Alligator Alley.

The FAA and the National Transportation Safety Board will investigate, with the NTSB leading the investigation. One NTSB investigator arrived at the crash site Friday afternoon, with several more expected to arrive on Saturday.

Brianna Walker saw the wing of the plane drag the car in front of hers and slam into the wall.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Well they lost both engines. Hopefully that’s what they focus on in the investigation.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The only thing I'm aware of that would take out both engines at the same time is bird strikes ... especially if they were already in an approach.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Do jets like this have independent fuel tanks and fuel pumps per engine? I would imagine redundancy is king and this is obvious but I know nothing of aviation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I’d expect redundant fuel pumps, redundant fuel lines in order for any tank (and any pump) to fuel all engines while shutting the remainder of tanks (and pumps) off. That’s been around since piston engine fighters in WWII at least.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

AFAIK every jet engine plane has wing tanks with fuel pumps (to distribute the weight evenly).

But I'm not an engineer or pilot so could be wrong on that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This plane has several tanks and several fuel pumps per engine, as well as a fuel filt bypass in the event of a filter clog. The most probably cause for this crash was either a) birds. or B) single engine failure close to the field and the pilots killed the remaining good engine by mistake and with so little altitude (the flight was nearly complete and they were only about 1000ft AGL and less than a mile from the airfield) they could not restart the plane. These are the most likely reasons for the crash. Really sad either way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yes, depending on the manufacturer they could have multiple pumps per engine, separate tanks, crossfeed from the opposite tank etc.

[–] SheeEttin 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

https://www.smartcockpit.com/docs/CL605-FUEL_SYSTEM.pdf

That's for the 605, which I assume isn't too different. It says "The boost pumps can provide fuel to both engines fuel feed systems through a crossover feed line."

A quick read suggests that primary fuel pumping is powered by the engines, and the boost pumps are only used to boost fuel pressure (e.g. when first starting the engines). There are also multiple systems, including plain old gravity, to move fuel around between the various tanks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Lots of options, fuel starvation, contaminated fuel, exceeding the altitude limits of the aircraft or engines and improper restart procedures such as Pinnacle 3701 in 2004. Many many more options, the NTSB has very skilled accident investigators and almost certainly will find the cause, and then blame the pilots.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

As well as the collision with terrain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is what really did it, in my professional opinion. They would have been just fine without any engines had they not been flying over any terrain. Unfortunately, this time they just weren't so lucky, as they were flying over a Florida interstate, which might even be fine for a plane going slow on its wheels, but not for flying through. I suspect the NTSB and FAA will concur.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Thanks for posting that.

I also found a USA Today article that states the Challenger 600 series has had 6 crash incidents, 2 of which are partially blamed on "unstable approaches".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Definitely gravity. Damn you, Newton!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

The two people killed were the pilot and copilot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

It's probably because we TAXED the Rich Owner too much and He could NOT afford to make the plane safe!

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago

It went too low.