this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
390 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
154 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An estimated $4 to $20 billion in value, what is he thinking?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 152 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

Honestly, after this, and hearing some of his recent interviews: I am genuinely convinced that not only is Elon Musk not a genius, but he possess subpar intelligence. You can’t convince me otherwise, I am 100% convinced that the dude is just a clinical moron.

There has been a meme comparing Elon Musk to Wheatley from Portal 2 being put in charge of the whole Aperture Science center and it immediately going to shit, because this robot was literally purposely designed to be a moron… It keeps on getting truer.

To me, he is like Trump, people thinking the dude is a genius, and he’s constantly playing 4D chess, but over time, everything ends up proving that the simplest theory is the correct one, the dude is just a fucking idiot. A man so profoundly stupid at their core that people had to convince themselves, he actually was a secret genius for their nonsense to make sense, like believing that Jar Jar Binks was secretly a mastermind Sith Lord.

If there ever was a perfect demonstration of wealth not equating intelligence, or even merit, the absolute inexistence of meritocracy, this might be it.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's even worse than that.

Musk is practically stuck in a 13yo's mindset. The golden spoon has been sticking out of his arse since birth, but of course momma and poppa will make little Elmo believe he's a genius because he has... gasp... ideas.

So they push a shitton of money into his education and ideas, and of course he gets stuck in the typical preteen daydreaming phase of being a genius billionaire who can never be wrong. The money allows him to surround himself with people who actually KNOW how to deal with stuff - including making sure he can't screw things up. And that's how the whole Musk Management department of SpaceX was practically born.

But now Twitter is a different story, all his safety nets are gone, and it's all on him. Of course he fumbles it big time.

Simply said, yes, he's an absolute moron. With more money than common sense or logic or talent or knowledge or... Okay this list could go on for a while, I think it's best to stop here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I really liked the Some More News episode on this! It explains pretty well how regardless of a rich person's intelligence they probably get corrupted by mental distortions due to being rich. That is, Elon haa probably been powertripping for too long and lost all basis on how to take good decisions because he lives in his own rich fantasy world thinking he accomplished everything because of his own superior genius...

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I worked for a guy, many years ago, small scale version of Musk. Guys like that hate to be contradicted. He had gone into partnership with my old company - which was a digital election company (back in the 90s and early 00s). We prided ourselves on our security and anonymity measures. Under this new company, this guy because CEO, and the first thing he did was tell everyone we could make “millions” by selling user data. I pointed out that violated out privacy and anonymity standards, and not even the next day I was reprimanded for speaking out.

You don’t need to be a billionaire to be stupid. Affluent is enough of a threshold. These are all grifters, granted many being successful. The grifters in this company were big fish/little pond. But they ruined a lovely little company that could have been stable and steady, recession-proof income for decades. Instead, they grifted the angel investors, ran the company into the ground and ended up spawning dozens of competitors in the field whereas before there were only 2 or 3.

These guys go from start-up grift to start-up grift, maintaining their affluence on the investor’s dime. I would say they, and the vulture capitalists they dance with deserve each other, but unfortunately, regular folks are always the collateral damage.

Musk was likely always an idiot, but was propped up by money, and earlier on either knew his place (as the “faceman”) or was adroitly distracted from direct involvement with the actual running of the company he bought.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lmaydev 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't get essentially buy established companies and then pretend he invented them.

Tesla and spacex for sure. PayPal was created by merging with another company that did a lot of the work.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He does indeed have a history of paying his way into looking like a visionary and/or an engineer. He bought into Tesla in early 2004, it was founded in mid 2003.

His comfort zone was convincing people to give him money for one really ambitious thing, and then using that money to achieve some other thing (that no one would have given him money for) that is sort of on the way, but which has commercial value to him.

For example, he has repeatedly said his companies will deliver full self-driving cars by dates that have passed - and convinced investors to get him in a position to compete with companies like Toyota, promised a 'hyperloop' and got funding to compete with other horizontal drilling companies, promised to send people to mars and got to compete with other satellite technology companies.

So making big promises paid off for him. For the investors, in terms of long term value, they might have been better off investing in existing companies he ended up competing with.

But I suspect he is now outside his comfort zone, and might not even realise how far out of his depth he is.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

https://time.com/6203815/elon-musk-flaws-billionaire-visions/ the Hyperloop only exists to thunderfuck public transportation projects. Stop giving him benefit of the doubt.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 119 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Everything is tweets now, on all platforms; hear me out.

It might sound lazy, and I certainly have no loyalty to the Twitter brand, but if Musk isn't going to defend it we have the opportunity to dilute and generalize the term (like zipper or band-aid). We can kill it dead AND reclaim it.

It's a good word! Short, sweet, has familiarity, and is honestly pretty descriptive for the simple bird-like chatter of the discourse. Everything else proposed sounds dumb as hell, not to mention you're doing the marketing for them. Don't sell their brands - suffocate them!

[–] [email protected] 114 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I enjoyed reading this tweet

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

Not gonna lie, that still felt a little dirty. But I already posted it to the internet and there's no going backsies.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

As someone who prefers threaded interaction, it’s gonna be hard to stop calling them posts. Maybe that’s what my grandkids will think is old fashioned about me.

“They’s been posts since BBS and they’ll stay posts!”

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

I think personal micro-blogging (mastodon) and posting forum-style topics (reddit) can have different words?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The original post was at least half joking in tone, but in seriousness, I think there's an argument to be made that "posts" applies to topical threads. Threads that originate with a piece of content like a link or self post and that all following discussion is at least tangentially related. I'd call them posts here on Lemmy for that.

Tweets, however, often originate out of thin air, be it someone's head or ass. When someone says, "Kanye West 'tweeted' " you've already determined about how seriously you're going to take it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

So tweets will be the generic term for short top level posts that aren't responding to anything?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

this appeals to me on such a visceral level.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Nice tweet bro

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Our logo is our most recognizable asset. That’s why we’re so protective of it." -Twitter's (Currently Outdated) Brand Toolkit Page

[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The best part is that because now it's just Unicode 𝕏, the logo is public domain and it can be used by anyone in that exact shape in any context.

No matter how good are their patent lawyers, I don't think they will succeed to trademark prior art designed by someone else

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also read that Microsoft is holding the trademark on 'X' because of DirectX, X-Box, etc...

I wonder how long until Elon pulls the "it's just a joke bro"

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Meta hold the trademark on X for social networking, I read. Maybe it will be in the prize pot for the cage fight?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's even worse than that. X is used so widely in trademarks that it's guaranteed to attract lawsuits. Facebook had to settle several claims over the change to Meta, and the use of X is a much bigger problem than that. And Musk is so dumb that he'll probably try to fight them and end up paying a fortune in legal fees anyway.

Edit: Relevant article: https://www.reuters.com/technology/problem-with-x-meta-microsoft-hundreds-more-own-trademarks-new-twitter-name-2023-07-25/

[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I don’t think twitter has $30B in valuation left. Musk bought it for $44B (which was beyond its value at the time, but okay). Since his takeover, it’s lost between 50-60% of its value. That was as of several months ago, so I have to imagine it’s even less now.

With the loss of brand equity, they might be sliding towards the single digit billions very quickly.

He’s just setting money on fire at this point.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dude it's 4D chess brah /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What I don't understand is how he can still be in charge, at all? Do shareholders not have any legal mechanism to get him removed?

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (4 children)

He is the only share owner. He bought the whole company.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Oh shit, I thought he just bought a majority stake in it. Sucks that he's able to disrupt so many employees' lives in the process of his tantrums & acid trip ideas.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

He’s the largest shareholder and it’s a private company, which is why we depend on companies holding his debt for guesstimates about the valuation. There’s no market forces that are punishing him for bad decisions, other than him not being able to service his/twitter’s debt based on twitter’s dwindling income.

Jack Dorsey and his Saudi partners agreed to hold onto their shares (ie, not force Musk to buy them) and together they held about $3.5B out of the $44B valuation when it went private. Dorsey just started offering some super gentle criticism while saying it’s a very hard job.

I don’t know if they’re under NDAs, or if they’re afraid of crashing their investments further by criticizing him in public, or if they just don’t care because what’s a few billion between friends. Maybe they’re sending him angry texts.

I’m just hoping that someone comes out with a tell-all that ends up being a movie called The Anti-Social Network.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Prior to Musk, IIRC, the valuation was around $11B.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

TWTR had about 765M shares outstanding. I didn’t follow them throughout the entire run up to the Muskening, but it looked like they were averaging somewhere in the neighborhood of $35/share, meaning their valuation would be about $25-30B. I’m deliberately ignoring the fact that they went into the 60s and 70s for an extended period in 2021 because I’m not sure what was driving that apart from cheap money and higher online activity during covid.

I still think he overpaid by a factor of about 1.5.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (7 children)

On purpose.

Only clearer by the day that this was all an exercise to intentionally kill Twitter to the benefit of billionaires, fascists and other extremists.

Twitter existed as a relatively free and open public space to communicate, organize and assemble to take actions for and against things at scale before musk (e.g. The Arab Spring, a terrifying moment for the Saudis especially - the second largest shareholder behind musk).

When people collectively laughed at elon and his cringe, inbred, emerald boy antics or his humiliating divorce and other routine failures, Twitter was the bullhorn.

Now elon and his desperate far right Toadies will work to try to rewrite reality so they can eventually have this conversation:

"Twitter? What's a Twitter? Wait, are you talking about blork? A bird? No, blork's logo is a dinosaur with chainsaw arms... and everyone wants to be his best friend... and it's against the law to divorce him... and he's cool... and..."

What an everlasting tool history will remember you as, elon. If they remember you at all, it will be to laugh at you - you'll never outrun that.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Stop giving Musk so much credit, he's shown historically that he's just massive narcissistic fuck up who got lucky in the dot com bubble. There's no reason to think there's some far right conspiracy here, he only bought the website because he got in a pissing match and couldn't get out when he tried.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm inclined to agree with others here in the thread. I honestly don't think this was an intentional action designed to tank Twitter. It may well be doing just that, but frankly, Elon has proven time and again that he's a world-class idiot.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Musk did not pay $44 billion to buy Twitter. He paid $26 billion, underwritten by stock in Tesla, which subsequently lost significant value. $5 billion was from other investors including the Saudi Prince.

The remaining $13 billion was a loan Twitter took out to buy itself on Musk's behalf. Even before Musk started tanking the revenue, Twitter could not afford that debt - the interest alone was comparible to its revenue. That debt is probably about what Twitter is worth right now after the name change, making it pretty much unviable as a business.

You don't have to look at Musk's antics to conclude that the intention was to kill the company. You only have to look at the financials.

Leveraged buyouts almost always lead to the business closing. It's how Toys R Us, and many other staple brands, were brought down.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This fucking dude could have spent <$1M hiring a small team to spin up a heavily customized X-branded Mastodon server, but instead he spent $44 BILLION dollars buying and ruining Twitter.

How fucking crazy is that? That's fucking crazy... right?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this is the guy who decided to build a tunnel under LA to skip traffic and then instead built one in las vegas that gets traffic jams

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (16 children)

wait he actually built that?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

yes but he built it in las vegas. It has a few stops and relies on teslas, each with a driver, and it functions as a very basic "public transit" system. Almost none of what he initially promised are present in the final design. Originally it was going to be his "hyperloop" thing. Then it was "autonomous vehicles." Now it's "teslas driven by people"

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This makes the most sense. Man he's trying really hard to not admit that a subway works pretty well, isn't he?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It seems to me that recently, Big Tech CEOs have been searching for interesting and creative ways to utterly destroy their company with no chance to rebuild it. Maybe he is trying to do that? At this point, it seems to me like Elon is doing his best diligence to set money on fire and run Twitter into the ground.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

WR lose $900 billion any% speedrun

load more comments
view more: next ›