this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
411 points (98.6% liked)

News

23014 readers
6 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Department of Homeland Security had directed the state to stop blocking the U.S. Border Patrol’s access to roughly 2½ miles of the U.S.-Mexico border

Texas is refusing to comply with a cease-and-desist letter from the Biden administration over actions by the state that have impeded U.S. Border Patrol agents from accessing part of the border with Mexico.

In a letter to the Department of Homeland Security, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton rejected the Biden administration’s request for the state to “cease and desist” its takeover of Shelby Park, an epicenter of southwest border illegal immigration in Eagle Pass.

"Because the facts and law side with Texas, the State will continue utilizing its constitutional authority to defend her territory, and I will continue defending those lawful efforts in court," Paxton wrote.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 124 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because the facts and law side with Texas

Lol no they don't. Paxton knows that. Federal agents always have jurisdiction over the border

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

Right, I mean, literally the federal government could claim 200 miles from the border in Texas and the only thing that could stop them is a bad interpretation of the law by the Supreme Court. Which probably puts it within the realm of possibility, to be honest.

[–] [email protected] 116 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just send in an 18 year old kid with a gun, those Texans will be petrified with fear and won’t even be able to respond. Or does that only work when it’s at a school?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just designate the area as an "open air campus" and then you're good to go.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 88 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I mean, they are occupying a section of the border of the entire country, and denying, through threat of violence, the federal government/military access to said border. At some point, this simply has to be read as insurrection, and put down. A country only gets to exist and enforce laws by virtue of the implied violence (physical or otherwise) that it can leverage to back it up.

Of course there are complications to this, like the thought that steamrolling these troopers would then spark a greater revolt. But when you have a state doing things like this, particularly a state that has made it abundantly clear they desire to secede and have prepared for secession, I think you need to play hardball. This could be either by forcibly bringing them back in line through state violence, or giving them what they want, in such a way that it ends up being a pyrrhic victory; imagine aggressive border protocols and removal of free travel along the Texas border, intense tariffs and duties on Texan goods, etc… honestly a Texit could be quite beneficial for the country, shifting congress balances somewhat. Add in some statehood’s for PR, Guam and DC and now you’re really cooking with gas.

Who knows though, I’m still finding it hard to believe that the Jan 6 insurrectionists weren’t mowed down in machine gun fire when they penetrated the capitol, so clearly my expectations of government reaction and what actually happens have some daylight between them.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think having the FBI arrest the leadership is a better approach than troops killing each other.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I mean that’s fine, but you’d run the same risk there with bluff-calling and standoffs. Like clearly Texas is trying to bait the feds into either rolling over for a cheap win, or doing something that they might be able to use to spark something more significant. Not sure which is worse, but I know which one will look more weak/will incite further escalators acts on Texas’ part.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So the larger issue is that Republicans will continue pushing the goalposts until eventually a drastic action has to be taken. Better now, I think.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

particularly a state that has made it abundantly clear they desire to secede and have prepared for secession

The state GOP rejected the petition to even add secession on their primary ballot, and the state Supreme Court declined to take up the pro-secession group's request to intervene.

So it's not really accurate to broadly paint the entire state as frothing at the mouth to secede. We have a sizeable number of idiots who do, but it's objective not part of the Republican state party platform, much less the general population supporting it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I mean I’m sure plenty of Texans have no desire to succeed. But there are multiple real actions that suggest the state has it in mind: separate border enforcement forces, isolated power grid, the Texas rangers/trooper or whatever they’re called. It may all just be maneuvering/bluster, but when you see the state power structures trying to create Amon Bundy-standoffs it does make one wonder.

There also nascent secession movements elsewhere, California has a visible one.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 82 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

What's the issue? Get a ton of federal agents, march on the border, arrest all obstructing Texas shitheads and beat them down with the book. Make examples out of them.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (3 children)

That will likely result in bloodshed. I think it's inevitable at this point unless Biden decides to completely roll over.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (10 children)

There's not going to be any bloodshed. Texas National Guard soldiers want to go home safely every night, just like everyone else. I think the main issue is the border patrol doesn't want a conflict.

Biden could nationalize the Texas Guard troops at the fence. Then give them a direct order to open the gate. If they don't, dishonorable discharge for disobeying a direct order from the President. No pension, no nothing. They will open the gate.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

We already handled the “what are you going to do if we don’t follow the law” question here once, they must have just taken that part out of their history books.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

In a letter to the Department of Homeland Security, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton rejected the Biden administration’s request for the state to “cease and desist”

WTF? A cease and desist is a demand, not a "request!"

That's not even quoting Texas' fascist AG or anything; that's the article writers' own spin. Why are Julia Ainsley and Zoë Richards carrying water for fascists?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Their editors told them it makes more money, I'd guess.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 9 months ago

The only thing Ken Paxton should be defending in court is himself for securities fraud.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just arrest all these fuckers, starting with the Texas Governor.

[–] vrek 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The governor sucks but please start with Paxton.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago

Invite them both to the White House. Then arrest them at the same time

[–] [email protected] 52 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Revoke all federal funding until they comply

[–] [email protected] 37 points 9 months ago

Use their federal funding to forcibly remove them and place them in prison. Governance of national borders is not and should not be contingent on the presumed compliance of some malicious shitheads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

For fuck's sake, arrest these nimrods. At gunpoint, because God knows they aren't fucking cooperative.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 9 months ago (2 children)

"Now stop it or we'll send another sternly-worded letter!"

[–] [email protected] 42 points 9 months ago (26 children)

Arrest the guy for obstructing federal agencies. Then send another strongly worded letter to everyone else.

If they still refuse… arrest them too.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago

That would be nice, wouldn't it?

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Dems: “Help! We sent a letter with strongest possible wording, it wasn’t effective, and we’re all out of ideas!”

How many times do conservatives have to slap Dems in the face before realizing they aren’t good faith actors?! Genocide in the Middle East, murder for fun on the southern border…what a mess.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The clear answer here is to say if Texas demands to police the boarder, all Federal boarder agents will be pulled back, and funding for boarder protection will be withheld. You can’t have it both ways.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

Republicans: We need stronger border protections!

DHS: Here's increased BPD funding and facility modernization efforts.

Republicans: No. Only death.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Time to recolonize Texas, send in the settlers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

God I hate our state government

Also remember Ken Paxton is a criminal

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

They decided the pronouns of Texas are her? Awfully progressive, didn't know the state of Texas could even have a gender?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

...so arrest it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Isn’t that insurrection? The Texas government needs to be dismantled and rebuilt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Time for my daily comment on this situation that Biden won't do shit because the only true crime to democrats is hurting Republican feels.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Is it so hard to ask for a President that Respects the Rule Of Law? If poor people did this they would be in jail! A Politician does this and gets a sternly worded letter!

load more comments
view more: next ›